What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Round 1 Vs The Roosters

Zampaa

Juniors
Messages
122
A lot of backs have been named on the bench, and spent time in the middle recently, I wonder if Chrighton is the next to do it? Don't think he'd be the worst at 9 or 13 for 25 minutes.
 

Fangs

Coach
Messages
13,945
Some do. Most would pick say Burns to cover the role. Backup 9 is more important

Ain't saying its right, its just a trend.

https://www.nrl.com/news/2020/03/10/round-1-nrl-team-lists/

Brad Takairangi
Kerrod Holland
Michael Oldfield
Brian Kelly
Jamayne Issako
Alex Johnston
Stephen Crichton

At a glance I count 7 outside backs, almost half the teams in the competition. Some like Takairangi have the frame to play back row. I'd still agree 9/spine cover is more important. Its easier to find a backrower/centre than a backrower/hooker so guys like May are more ideal.

In a way I prefer it because it means Luai will actually get 80 minutes. Debate on the 6 aside I think the spine shouldn't be f**ked with, they can all play 80 minutes. Korisau has no competition for his spot this weekend and any first grade hooker of his experience should be able to get through a full game.
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
Ain't saying its right, its just a trend.

https://www.nrl.com/news/2020/03/10/round-1-nrl-team-lists/

Brad Takairangi
Kerrod Holland
Michael Oldfield
Brian Kelly
Jamayne Issako
Alex Johnston
Stephen Crichton

At a glance I count 7 outside backs, almost half the teams in the competition. Some like Takairangi have the frame to play back row. I'd still agree 9/spine cover is more important. Its easier to find a backrower/centre than a backrower/hooker so guys like May are more ideal.

In a way I prefer it because it means Luai will actually get 80 minutes. Debate on the 6 aside I think the spine shouldn't be f**ked with, they can all play 80 minutes. Korisau has no competition for his spot this weekend and any first grade hooker of his experience should be able to get through a full game.

Holland plays some hooker
Takarangi would be cover for Blake and can play backrow.
T.Turbo under doubt. So Kelly on there

How many actually start there is the question
 

Zampaa

Juniors
Messages
122
Ain't saying its right, its just a trend.

https://www.nrl.com/news/2020/03/10/round-1-nrl-team-lists/

Brad Takairangi
Kerrod Holland
Michael Oldfield
Brian Kelly
Jamayne Issako
Alex Johnston
Stephen Crichton

At a glance I count 7 outside backs, almost half the teams in the competition. Some like Takairangi have the frame to play back row. I'd still agree 9/spine cover is more important. Its easier to find a backrower/centre than a backrower/hooker so guys like May are more ideal.

In a way I prefer it because it means Luai will actually get 80 minutes. Debate on the 6 aside I think the spine shouldn't be f**ked with, they can all play 80 minutes. Korisau has no competition for his spot this weekend and any first grade hooker of his experience should be able to get through a full game.

Papenhauzen thrived at lock last season, and I remember ponga playing fairly big minutes at lock in origin. It can work, and hopefully it does for us.
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,382
I keep hearing that Mansour is moving into another position, if not in the outside backs, does he cover Api for a 15min break? Ivan did float josh reynolds there around at the tigers there before his injuries, it makes sense to me why Stephen Crichton is on the bench, and not Burton. And Fish is purely on the bench due to his pec injury, theyd want to ease him on, give him the easier 60min run, he'll come on 20mins later in wherever Ivan needs him, as he can play Prop, 2nd row and Lock, perfect sub and impact player, the other 2 benchies are just props, if mansour is moved to 9 for a spell, then the list makes sense, otherwise????
 

mxlegend99

Referee
Messages
23,331
I keep hearing that Mansour is moving into another position, if not in the outside backs, does he cover Api for a 15min break? Ivan did float josh reynolds there around at the tigers there before his injuries, it makes sense to me why Stephen Crichton is on the bench, and not Burton. And Fish is purely on the bench due to his pec injury, theyd want to ease him on, give him the easier 60min run, he'll come on 20mins later in wherever Ivan needs him, as he can play Prop, 2nd row and Lock, perfect sub and impact player, the other 2 benchies are just props, if mansour is moved to 9 for a spell, then the list makes sense, otherwise????
Mansour was never being moved. That was a rumour that originated here from people saying he should be given a run in the forwards.
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,382
Pretty sure being able to pass is a crucial requirement for a hooker, Sauce can’t pass.
Mansour in a hooker for a spell, is technically a forward.
Sauce can pass, he is usually on the receiving end of a forward pass, besides his scoots from dummy half are usually pretty good
 

OldPanther

Coach
Messages
13,404
Well if that is the run on side, with no changes, its a good chance that might be the idea, until kenny or may are available

There's no chance at all that Mansour plays hooker ever. If that 1 - 17 is correct it means Crichton is most likely getting a short stint at fullback with the rest of the spine playing 80 minutes.
 

roofromoz

First Grade
Messages
7,580
Can't help but think that this will be the first of about 24 times that Ellis gets named at 21 and then gets cut 24 hours before kick off.
 

TheFrog

Coach
Messages
14,300
There's no chance at all that Mansour plays hooker ever. If that 1 - 17 is correct it means Crichton is most likely getting a short stint at fullback with the rest of the spine playing 80 minutes.
You'd at least give him a run there in reserve grade or trial games, not against the back to back premiers. Is it possible one of the outside backs are in doubt? Or maybe Ivan is considering a little "workload management"
 

martielang

Bench
Messages
3,499
Yep people are making this way more complicated then what it probably is. I think Api will play 80. Cleary likely just wants to cover the outside backs & picked the next in line. He obviously thinks the pack has the fitness to allow a back on the bench, much like when Hook hardly used/needed his 4th bench spot.
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
Yep people are making this way more complicated then what it probably is. I think Api will play 80. Cleary likely just wants to cover the outside backs & picked the next in line. He obviously thinks the pack has the fitness to allow a back on the bench, much like when Hook hardly used/needed his 4th bench spot.

Api hasn’t played a full game for about 2 years. I doubt he goes straight to a full game prob 60mins or so.
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
After the team was announced I just assumed Api will play 80.

Crichton makes sense on the bench as there's a 50% chance one of our outside backs will need to be hooked mid game.

And if the backs don’t need hooking and Api gets gassed
 

Latest posts

Top