We would get more games from timmy though.he'd be as handy as the rest of the bargain buys out there including Timmy..
What a shame. This Mitchell kid better be something special.Given his form in recent games you would assume his value on the market has risen and with what cap space is left he may be above what we have available.
We would get more games from timmy though.
Stagger, why are parra not trying to keep Kingston? Cant afford him, or do they see mitchell as a good enough replacement?
It's just a fact mate, 88 games in 7 years says something about the bloke, his body isn't up to NRL standard and he can't handle the week in week out style of this game. But yeah let's sign him he will probably play 3 games for us over 3 years, i'd prefer Robson over Matt head.Stop dickriding Tim Smith, i would prefer Matt Head injury prone or not.
Your honestly comparing that to Matt Head are you? You are an idiot. Two totally different situations. Tim left because of personal and health reasons. Matt Head just can't handle the NRL.Exactly, last time we had Smith on our cap for a year, how many games did we get?
What a shame. This Mitchell kid better be something special.
Cool, can't see him getting a game this season with the combination we got now between keats and kinga. But hopefully he gets his run next season. I haven't seen much of him to comment.if Anthony Mitchell hasn't played a fg game by the end of the year he'd start at round 1 next year as Tim Mannah did...
he's a REAL! talent and probably the reason why we haven't committed with Kinga yet.
if Anthony Mitchell hasn't played a fg game by the end of the year he'd start at round 1 next year as Tim Mannah did...
he's a REAL! talent and probably the reason why we haven't committed with Kinga yet.
Your honestly comparing that to Matt Head are you? You are an idiot. Two totally different situations. Tim left because of personal and health reasons. Matt Head just can't handle the NRL.
You would get more value and games out of mortimer keating and robson. Matt Head would be a waste of time.
I wasn't trying to start this into a tim smith thread either, but when stagger said head would be better then smith i just made the statement we would get more games out of tim.
You would prefer Matt Head, i would prefer Tim Smith. No point arguing. Let's just move on, we will never agree.Smith isn't up to it mentally, Head isn't up to it physically, although this year it has mainly been better players keeping him out I believe (same as Smith, although he has been injured aswell).
Your comment has no basis.
On recent footy, it would be easier to argue Head as the more durable player.
I do not know you, and am not naive enough to make a comment on you're intellectual capabilities.
Kingston is making a impact though, blooding Mitchell would be a drawn out operation. Its hard to take when you have Kinga playing so well to be pinning your hopes on a guy who really won't make the same impact for a longtime.
I'm sorry i thought this was a forum where people were entitled to their opinions. Or are we only allowed an opinion if it is the same as yours?Stop dickriding Tim Smith, i would prefer Matt Head injury prone or not.
Smith isn't up to it mentally, Head isn't up to it physically, although this year it has mainly been better players keeping him out I believe (same as Smith, although he has been injured aswell).
Your comment has no basis.
On recent footy, it would be easier to argue Head as the more durable player.
I do not know you, and am not naive enough to make a comment on you're intellectual capabilities.
I'm sorry i thought this was a forum where people were entitled to their opinions. Or are we only allowed an opinion if it is the same as yours?