phantom eel
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,327
Infinity minus Suity?How many power rangers could there possibly be?:crazy:
Last edited:
Infinity minus Suity?How many power rangers could there possibly be?:crazy:
You know you must be really spouting some out there shit when Pou, El D and Phantom all manage to actually agree, against your agenda/opinion.
How many power rangers could there possibly be?:crazy:
How many power rangers could there possibly be?:crazy:
With all that's happened and hindsight I wish fitzy was not as arrogant. he actually thought that he owned parra. He made so many enemies. Maybe if he wasn't so anal, change would not have been needed.I know you're close with Overton, Just wondering why he let do what he wanted? Or am I wrong. Things could have been different.... It's been one disaster after another.
I noticed a kid with "Zibara" Merch on at the game last week, Struck me as odd, I hadn't seen it before, a Lightning bolt with the word acorss it, on the Shoulder interrupting the stripes.
Interesting. Junior operations were until recently the realy of the Footy Club, which was a 3P domain, up until it had to be wound up... :sarcasm:They are a major sponsor of our junior operations I believe. Only found out earlier this year when I noticed it splashed out over all the marquees/tents at the trials.
Jake, if you can't read MITS piece, and then the stuff being dredged up , which mainly relate to the last dregs of the previous admin then I really doubt your reasons
There are some serious attempts to ruin the club from disgruntled now outsiders, they are vermin and deserve our scorn and venom. Your continued delight in blaming those who fell into the mess is legendary. You have smashed Sharp as he tried to try and turn the mess he and the current boats inherited around, only to be blindsided by those who leak and offer stories to journos like Prozenko to their selfish ends. I hope you are enjoying this as it certainly seems like it
Jake, if you can't read MITS piece, and then the stuff being dredged up , which mainly relate to the last dregs of the previous admin then I really doubt your reasons
There are some serious attempts to ruin the club from disgruntled now outsiders, they are vermin and deserve our scorn and venom. Your continued delight in blaming those who fell into the mess is legendary. You have smashed Sharp as he tried to try and turn the mess he and the current boats inherited around, only to be blindsided by those who leak and offer stories to journos like Prozenko to their selfish ends. I hope you are enjoying this as it certainly seems like it
Man, the lack of logic there is astounding ;-).
Good night Jake, you've truly excelled yourself.
My idea is a 3 stage system. I haven't done calculations yet so don't hold me to numbers
1st stage - player salaries, allowances & other payments from club. There are set tiers of contracts, you must have set number of each and it's the same at every club. Example 3 players get $700k, 4 get $500k, etc. Perhaps there may be allowance if club doesn't want 3 top tier players, they can have an extra tier 2 and upgrade tier 4 to tier 3, whatever it is, as I said haven't done calcs, but there has to be enough disparity between the tiers to encourage distribution of talent, but not so much to cause player group issues. The cap could be the same as it is now, less or more but should probably be tied to broadcast deal. So players' overall salary is the same at every club.
2nd stage - "TPAs" sourced from anywhere except can't be guaranteed by club & can't be in a direct relationship with club e.g. Rusty can't fork over his own money to Burgess. Other than those rules if Dyldam want to sponsor the club & Norman, they can. Player can introduce their own, sponsors can choose their sponsoree or clubs can direct sponsorship to certain players. This is also where NRL exemptions & allowances are included for long term juniors, etc. There would also be exemptions for certain sponsors, commonly the larger corporations who are sponsoring the player regardless of where they play. There has to be a limit set high enough to encourage increased pay to the entire playing group, but low enough that it doesn't just become a 'who has the wealthiest fans' battle. Also there'd be a determination from the NRL if a player is getting substantial sponsorship then his player salary tier suggest he should.
3rd stage - The above the "TPA" limit payments. So if you go above the 2nd stage limit, you aren't breaching, instead the club gets taxed dollar for dollar the amount it goes over the cap by and that money gets distributed to every player at clubs who didn't go over limit, based on player salary up to their respective club's 2nd stage limit. There would then be a hard cap at this stage, which would be breach for going over, automatic fine plus tax plus potential points deduction.
It's probably not too far distant except the last stage to what is effectively happening at the moment, but I reckon having it set, known to the fans & stupidarse media will make it more transparent and do a better job of evening talent than it currently is
Where doomed
I like it.
But my only concern is that, theoretically, players could oppose this idea by declaring it limits their earning potential.
If Terry Hill was able to block a draft by using that excuse, then I worry how long it would take a player (and his agent) to declare that they shouldn't be limited to tier 4 or 5 - regardless of TPA's.
It might also give a leg-up to the clubs with great TPA systems already in place - get a bloke to agree to sign for $500,000, when he would be worth $700,000 elsewhere, and top up the rest with TPA's.
But I like your thinking.
Perhaps the NRL, in the interest of a fair and equal competition, should start determining minimum values for players, and enforcing them - but then, I suppose, players would whinge that their financial affairs are public, and they have the right to privacy.
Where doomed - Bring on 2017��