I didn't say any of that. I said ARL were loathe to act. Ur making case game was in trouble in early 90's but were happy with side that showed no interest in moving game forward. I don't think you ppl know what you're arguing for..
Saturation thing is just a creation of ppl on this board who prefer dots on map. Clubs would've have moved already to gosford or the gong if the world worked like that. Businesses want a presence in Sydney so it's still more lucrative there.
I don’t know what you’re arguing. Something had to give. It wasn’t sustainable for a professional competition to have 11 sides in the one city without some massive financial windfall from a third party; notionally a TV deal or some rich private interests investing in each club. It’s unfortunate but it has happened in other sports as well after going from an amateur or semi-professional to a professional competition.
Also, as other posters are showing you, there were reports going around regarding the rationalisation of Sydney clubs. Also, as you pointed out yourself, expansion clubs were paying for the costs of travel and accomodation for Sydney clubs; highlighting how some Sydney clubs weren’t fit to run professional sporting teams.
Whether Super League occurred or not, it was inevitable that some of these Sydney teams would have had to face a choice; whether they were acted on by the ARL or just from market forces and competition. It’s a shame what did happen essentially, as natural death rather than meeting some prescribed standards by the peace deal, would have made for a less acrimonious result (it is what the ARL were probably wishing for - add teams from around the country and some of the Sydney clubs would have died/relocated/merged of their own volition because they couldn’t keep up)
Last edited: