The Forbidden Game-insightful book on what has & can happen

[madunit]

Show me where I made an excuse for Union.

All I did was mention facts to allow a reasonable and balanced argument to be had.

f**kwits like you and LJC are so damn unreasonable and stupid you see them as support for one code.

I don't recall asking you to stop attacking me, merely because your pissweak drivel cannot be considered an attack. More like a fart with no smell.

I'll leave you and LJC to your circle jerk.

 

[ParraEelsNRL]

Show me where I made an excuse for Union.

All through the thread saying yeah but League also did this and that and this back then and at this point they done that.

Do you even understand that you were indeed making excuses, can you Not see it?

All I did was mention facts to allow a reasonable and balanced argument to be had.

Did you?

Is that why this thread turned into a 40 page shitfight because you dragged in a reasonable debate and a balanced argument?

f**kwits like you and LJC are so damn unreasonable and stupid you see them as support for one code.

Hmmm, so you start with with me supposedly attacking, yet look at every single one of your replies.

Step back from the thread for 5 minutes hero.

I don't recall asking you to stop attacking me, merely because your pissweak drivel cannot be considered an attack. More like a fart with no smell.

Attacking you, are you some sort of paranoid delusional f**kwit or something, I have not attacked you at all outside the last page simply because the last few pages, you managed to piss me off with your one eyed drivel.

I'll leave you and LJC to your circle jerk.

About f**king time too, I said let it die the other day, but nooooooooooooooooooooo, you have to have the last word because you know better than everyone else.

Circle jerk, yeah you and your couple of mates in here know about that, you've proved it for 40 pages.

 

[magpie4ever]

Yeah, moderators at 10 paces. Handbags at the ready, girls.:lol:

 

[Te Kaha]

And seeing as you mentioned pictures big mouth, remember this fraud?


http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/s...ight=cheque+username_Te+Kaha_username&page=17

STFU.

Thats brilliant.. you bring up a fake reciept, lable it a "cheque" and Im supposed to have done something wrong??? f**k you are thick.

Yeah, moderators at 10 paces. Handbags at the ready, girls.:lol:

You could call it a "battle" of wits... if it wasnt for the fact that the junior moderator would be unarmed if that was the case.

 

[madunit]

All through the thread saying yeah but League also did this and that and this back then and at this point they done that.

Do you even understand that you were indeed making excuses, can you Not see it?

I can see how a delusional simpleton can see that. All I was doing was stating facts.

Did you?

Is that why this thread turned into a 40 page shitfight because you dragged in a reasonable debate and a balanced argument?

Balanced? hahahaha

Hmmm, so you start with with me supposedly attacking, yet look at every single one of your replies.

Step back from the thread for 5 minutes hero.

just did. And you were still here making dickheaded pronouncements. Your turn now.

Attacking you, are you some sort of paranoid delusional f**kwit or something, I have not attacked you at all outside the last page simply because the last few pages, you managed to piss me off with your one eyed drivel.

So why did you state in your post that I was complaining about being attacked? Make up your mind. The only people sprouting one eyed drivel is you and LJC.

About f**king time too, I said let it die the other day, but nooooooooooooooooooooo, you have to have the last word because you know better than everyone else.

so you're an oxymoron as well. Your repertoir is growing at an alarming rate.

Circle jerk, yeah you and your couple of mates in here know about that, you've proved it for 40 pages.

lame response.

If you are struggling to leave this thread, I'll make it easier for you.

Want me to lock the thread for you?

 

[LJC]

I've weakened. I'm responding to a fake fan!(Hope he bites back with his paraphrasing response- can't wait!)

MU you have twisted and retracted and then re contributed your crap throughout this thread!

I note that you had conceded that repression of RL has occurred when weight of evidence was building in the many contributions from others in this thread. These contributors changed your stance on the French example and other examples and then you sneakily retract the sentiment by re affirming your ludicrous reasoning of such events as not being an example or examples.

Their are many examples of repression against the game of RL and relatively few if any against RU.

I have merely pointed out that this repression could feasibly occur as a result of a bias against RL nurtured in most private schools and wealthy public schools. This is not the fault of the students but the system.

It's a farce that a far more attractive form of rugby (RL) is treated like an outcast in so may examples that have been shown in this thread.

I am merely pointing out that their is a logical source(private school bias toward RU) for such repression against RL but you deny that repression is taking place. RL is not telling schools to not take on RU but RU influences are definitely negating the chance for RL to be played in their institutions.

I see it that if these mostly private schools, take on RL with RU that you will see less repression against RL. Room for both is fine. Let the student work out which game they prefer and not be dictated to by a system based bias that only provides RU.

You may or may not see this as remedy but I see it as a start to solve the repression that the game of RL has and is dealing with.

 

[ParraEelsNRL]

I can see how a delusional simpleton can see that. All I was doing was stating facts.



Balanced? hahahaha



just did. And you were still here making dickheaded pronouncements. Your turn now.



So why did you state in your post that I was complaining about being attacked? Make up your mind. The only people sprouting one eyed drivel is you and LJC.



so you're an oxymoron as well. Your repertoir is growing at an alarming rate.

lame response.

If you are struggling to leave this thread, I'll make it easier for you.

Want me to lock the thread for you?

You are a dead set idiot.

You can not and will not leave the thread to die because you have to have the last say each time, you're a f**king genius.

Close the thread you sook, you're the one that has gone on and on and on in here and now that you have manged to turn people against you that agreed with you from the start, I guess that shows just how balanced you really are.

Lock it you little bitch.

 

[ParraEelsNRL]

I've weakened. I'm responding to a fake fan!(Hope he bites back with his paraphrasing response- can't wait!)

MU you have twisted and retracted and then re contributed your crap throughout this thread!

I note that you had conceded that repression of RL has occurred when weight of evidence was building in the many contributions from others in this thread. These contributors changed your stance on the French example and other examples and then you sneakily retract the sentiment by re affirming your ludicrous reasoning of such events as not being an example or examples.

Their are many examples of repression against the game of RL and relatively few if any against RU.

I have merely pointed out that this repression could feasibly occur as a result of a bias against RL nurtured in most private schools and wealthy public schools. This is not the fault of the students but the system.

It's a farce that a far more attractive form of rugby (RL) is treated like an outcast in so may examples that have been shown in this thread.

I am merely pointing out that their is a logical source(private school bias toward RU) for such repression against RL but you deny that repression is taking place. RL is not telling schools to not take on RU but RU influences are definitely negating the chance for RL to be played in their institutions.

I see it that if these mostly private schools, take on RL with RU that you will see less repression against RL. Room for both is fine. Let the student work out which game they prefer and not be dictated to by a system based bias that only provides RU.

You may or may not see this as remedy but I see it as a start to solve the repression that the game of RL has and is dealing with.

I wouldn't bother, the bloke has lost it and doesn't even know what he's arguing about anymore.

 

[Te Kaha]

I've weakened. I'm responding to a fake fan!(Hope he bites back with his paraphrasing response- can't wait!)

MU you have twisted and retracted and then re contributed your crap throughout this thread!

I note that you had conceded that repression of RL has occurred when weight of evidence was building in the many contributions from others in this thread. These contributors changed your stance on the French example and other examples and then you sneakily retract the sentiment by re affirming your ludicrous reasoning of such events as not being an example or examples.

Their are many examples of repression against the game of RL and relatively few if any against RU.

I have merely pointed out that this repression could feasibly occur as a result of a bias against RL nurtured in most private schools and wealthy public schools. This is not the fault of the students but the system.

It's a farce that a far more attractive form of rugby (RL) is treated like an outcast in so may examples that have been shown in this thread.

I am merely pointing out that their is a logical source(private school bias toward RU) for such repression against RL but you deny that repression is taking place. RL is not telling schools to not take on RU but RU influences are definitely negating the chance for RL to be played in their institutions.

I see it that if these mostly private schools, take on RL with RU that you will see less repression against RL. Room for both is fine. Let the student work out which game they prefer and not be dictated to by a system based bias that only provides RU.

You may or may not see this as remedy but I see it as a start to solve the repression that the game of RL has and is dealing with.

SO now its the "private schools" that are to blame... I know you cant, but can you explain why Rugby is more popular in the following countries where Rugby ISN'T restricted to or in some cases even have ANY private school, system, just of the top of my head... NZ, Samoa, Fiji, Tonga, Argentina, USA, Canada, Scotland, Ireland, France, SA, Wales, Japan, Italy.

 

[madunit]

You are a dead set idiot.

You can not and will not leave the thread to die because you have to have the last say each time, you're a f**king genius.

Close the thread you sook, you're the one that has gone on and on and on in here and now that you have manged to turn people against you that agreed with you from the start, I guess that shows just how balanced you really are.

Lock it you little bitch.

haha have a cry princess.

 

[madunit]

I've weakened. I'm responding to a fake fan!(Hope he bites back with his paraphrasing response- can't wait!)

MU you have twisted and retracted and then re contributed your crap throughout this thread!

I note that you had conceded that repression of RL has occurred when weight of evidence was building in the many contributions from others in this thread. These contributors changed your stance on the French example and other examples and then you sneakily retract the sentiment by re affirming your ludicrous reasoning of such events as not being an example or examples.

Their are many examples of repression against the game of RL and relatively few if any against RU.

I have merely pointed out that this repression could feasibly occur as a result of a bias against RL nurtured in most private schools and wealthy public schools. This is not the fault of the students but the system.

It's a farce that a far more attractive form of rugby (RL) is treated like an outcast in so may examples that have been shown in this thread.

I am merely pointing out that their is a logical source(private school bias toward RU) for such repression against RL but you deny that repression is taking place. RL is not telling schools to not take on RU but RU influences are definitely negating the chance for RL to be played in their institutions.

I see it that if these mostly private schools, take on RL with RU that you will see less repression against RL. Room for both is fine. Let the student work out which game they prefer and not be dictated to by a system based bias that only provides RU.

You may or may not see this as remedy but I see it as a start to solve the repression that the game of RL has and is dealing with.

A fake fan is one who ignores part of his own game's history.

So friends in high places are people in private schools? While that may be a case, it's hardly an issue given the much higher number of people in public schooling around the world in comparison.

Furthermore, Rugby League is quite prominent in Australian Catholic Schools and has been for many decades now. The schooling system in a lot of New Zealand schools (predominantly on the South Island) will be pro-Rugby Union, while in England they'd be more affiliated with soccer than any Rugby code.

I don't think friends in high places is as big an issue today as you seem to believe it is (for any code), but that's not to say they don't exist.

 

[magpie4ever]

I've weakened. I'm responding to a fake fan!(Hope he bites back with his paraphrasing response- can't wait!)

MU you have twisted and retracted and then re contributed your crap throughout this thread!

I note that you had conceded that repression of RL has occurred when weight of evidence was building in the many contributions from others in this thread. These contributors changed your stance on the French example and other examples and then you sneakily retract the sentiment by re affirming your ludicrous reasoning of such events as not being an example or examples.

Their are many examples of repression against the game of RL and relatively few if any against RU.

I have merely pointed out that this repression could feasibly occur as a result of a bias against RL nurtured in most private schools and wealthy public schools. This is not the fault of the students but the system.

It's a farce that a far more attractive form of rugby (RL) is treated like an outcast in so may examples that have been shown in this thread.

I am merely pointing out that their is a logical source(private school bias toward RU) for such repression against RL but you deny that repression is taking place. RL is not telling schools to not take on RU but RU influences are definitely negating the chance for RL to be played in their institutions.

I see it that if these mostly private schools, take on RL with RU that you will see less repression against RL. Room for both is fine. Let the student work out which game they prefer and not be dictated to by a system based bias that only provides RU.

You may or may not see this as remedy but I see it as a start to solve the repression that the game of RL has and is dealing with.

Listen you dickhead, Diocesan Catholic Schools are private schools and guess what; their chosen rugby code of choose (when you don't have a choose) is League. Without looking up the exact figures, I would suggest that they make up 70-80% of private schools in NSW and Qld; so your rant is bullshit.

Also, other private schools (GPS & CAS etc) do put forward rep teams to play in the NSW age rugby league championships (U15s and Opens)

Why don't you respond to my suggestion to get off your arse and do something about a perceived wrong?

f**k, you are a goose.

 

[ParraEelsNRL]

haha have a cry princess.

Crying? Far from it actually ...... laughing more like it!

This subject is a prickly one and everyone is going to have differing opinions either way. I said in one of my fist posts in this thread that we need to move on esp the French themselves and start looking to the future.

I guess I'm wrong with that too huh?

 

[LJC]

Magpie 4ever: U R A DROPKICK!

You choose one country sorry 2 Aust. states as a comparison to the worldwide repression of RL. You seriously need to have a good look at yourself.

RL struggles internationally because of the repressive bias that is perpetuated from the private school system that is worldwide.

I hope one day I will see RL being allowed to be played at most private schools around the world. That is clearly not the case!

Give yourself an upper cut and have a look at your attitude toward RL. It needs improving!

 

[thorson1987]

Magpie 4ever: U R A DROPKICK!

You choose one country sorry 2 Aust. states as a comparison to the worldwide repression of RL. You seriously need to have a good look at yourself.

RL struggles internationally because of the repressive bias that is perpetuated from the private school system that is worldwide.

I hope one day I will see RL being allowed to be played at most private schools around the world. That is clearly not the case!

Give yourself an upper cut and have a look at your attitude toward RL. It needs improving!

RL struggles internationally because the 3 main countries (Aus, NZ and Eng) only give a shit about themselves.

Which means we have a pissweak international federation in the RLIF.

 

[LJC]

For MU.

My heart is in the right place and yours?

Questionable to state the least as others in this folder have noted. I wonder why you are so quiet on criticizing the other relevant examples of repression in this folder(There are plenty of them)or can't you "balance" everything!?

You have yet to respond to the fact that the book "The Forbidden Game" is an example of repression against the sport of RL. This is well documented and if you take the time to read the blurb on the back of this book you will see the word "example".

 

[LJC]

RL struggles internationally because the 3 main countries (Aus, NZ and Eng) only give a shit about themselves.

Which means we have a pissweak international federation in the RLIF.

Fair call.

This current world cup is proving Australia, England and NZ are correctly taking up the slack. This world cup will be a phenomenal success and is already proving so.

Hope the people whom are denying the existence of widespread repression of RL are enjoying the world cup as well. Or are they really enjoying it?

 

[madunit]

For MU.

My heart is in the right place and yours?

Questionable to state the least as others in this folder have noted. I wonder why you are so quiet on criticizing the other relevant examples of repression in this folder(There are plenty of them)or can't you "balance" everything!?

You have yet to respond to the fact that the book "The Forbidden Game" is an example of repression against the sport of RL. This is well documented and if you take the time to read the blurb on the back of this book you will see the word "example".

I don't need to mention the acts of repression against Rugby League because you lot are already doing it, and there are many incidences of them.

I purely wanted to make you aware that RL was not 100% innocent, which has seemed to be a hard pill to swallow, but needs to be accepted and understood so that RL itself can learn from its errors in the past. The few times RL has acted aggressively towards Rugby Union has sometimes lead to some of the repressive acts committed by RU against RL. Why is this so hard to understand?

The Forbidden Game is an extreme example, which I have said all along. It;s extreme. It's isolated. It cannot be used to describe normal behaviour because it isn't.

The blurb on the back of the book even states that it is extreme, if you take the time to read it yourself. I have already said this and responded to it previously. You just ignored it as per usual.

 

[madunit]

Crying? Far from it actually ...... laughing more like it!

This subject is a prickly one and everyone is going to have differing opinions either way. I said in one of my fist posts in this thread that we need to move on esp the French themselves and start looking to the future.

I guess I'm wrong with that too huh?

No, thats exactly right.

I've said similar myself and for the most part, Rugby League, especially in France, has moved on from these sort of issues.

The games biggest issue is having a weak International Body that won't fight to protect the game in emerging nations against Rugby Union's actions.

 

[Te Kaha]

SO now its the "private schools" that are to blame... I know you cant, but can you explain why Rugby is more popular in the following countries where Rugby ISN'T restricted to or in some cases even have ANY private school, system, just of the top of my head... NZ, Samoa, Fiji, Tonga, Argentina, USA, Canada, Scotland, Ireland, France, SA, Wales, Japan, Italy.

Magpie 4ever: U R A DROPKICK!

RL struggles internationally because of the repressive bias that is perpetuated from the private school system that is worldwide.

I hope one day I will see RL being allowed to be played at most private schools around the world. That is clearly not the case!

Once again you ignore a question posed to you and make up shit again... You are obviously deluded by faith and not reason and evidence.