The Grubs Return

[Perth Red]

They need to get rid of the right of appeal imo. What did the judiciary see/learn at the appeal meeting that they didn't see when they made the initial judgement? Would cut clubs operating costs as well not having to pay all those lawyers!

 

[_Johnsy]

If your talking bout origin this year. It was Tonga on Dugan. Get ya facts straight.

I said Tonga, apoligies about the position. Ouch, touchy indeed.

On your rags sweety ?

 

[Snappy]

You said Lockyer or Tonga you gimp. huge difference.

 

[Big Pete]

Actually, Lockyer was penalised and his tackle wasn't as bad as Scott's. Lockyer shifted Watmough into a dangerous position but didn't drive him where as Scott's was basically a copybook spear.

Also it's not 'haha' funny but weird funny.

 

[_Johnsy]

Either was Lockyer, or Tonga attacking the winger in the air. So exactly what is the issue Pete, btw I don't see the humour ?

There is no way it was worse, comparable yeah, worse no.

If your talking bout origin this year. It was Tonga on Dugan. Get ya facts straight.

You said Lockyer or Tonga you gimp. huge difference.

Do you see the comma? You do understand it's function don't you ?

Either was Lockyer (spear tackle), (comma seperate incident) or Tonga attacking the player in the air.

I hope that helps you illiterate gimp. :roll::roll:

 

[_Johnsy]

Actually, Lockyer was penalised and his tackle wasn't as bad as Scott's. Lockyer shifted Watmough into a dangerous position but didn't drive him where as Scott's was basically a copybook spear.

Also it's not 'haha' funny but weird funny.

Sorry Pete. There was no penalty blown mate.

 

[Big Pete]

Sorry Pete. There was no penalty blown mate.

I suggest you watch it again.

72nd minute.

 

[Mr Angry]

should have been a penalty before Sir Gal had to extinguish an already voliatile situation with a brilliant piece of common sense.

Daly M Captain of the year..

I agree the pink guys should have dealt with it. Vigilante style never works out.

 

[Mr Fourex]

I agree the pink guys should have dealt with it. Vigilante style never works out.

Henry lieing in the way was no worse than countless other times across the round ........there was no reason for the referee to blow his whistle

other than for Paul Gallen viciously kicking at an opponents face.

 

[Snappy]

Do you see the comma? You do understand it's function don't you ?

Either was Lockyer (spear tackle), (comma seperate incident) or Tonga attacking the player in the air.

I hope that helps you illiterate gimp. :roll::roll:

Yeh sure thats what you meant :roll:

 

[_Johnsy]

I suggest you watch it again.

72nd minute.

Apologies mate, just saw on NRL game analyser. You are correct.

 

[_Johnsy]

Yeh sure thats what you meant :roll:

FMD you really are thick. get back to grade 1 chump. You can admit you are wrong, it's quite easy.

 

[Snappy]

What because I dont believe you that make me thick ? You didnt have that meaning the first time and you know it.

 

[Marshall_magic]

Funny how Qlders conveniently forget Jonathan Thurston's boot to the head of David Williams in SOO.
Where were the indignant cries of outrage then? Was pretty fair evidence of the act given the fractured eye socket.
Oh hang on, he's a Queenslander. Only pull out the "they're all out to get us" crap when it suits.:roll:

A better incident to compare it to was Slater stomping on Skandalis' head. He got 7 weeks for it. Gallen should have got something similar. I guess stomping and kicking is okay now. Well done judiciary, piss weak as usual.

 

[jason taylor]

Henry lieing in the way was no worse than countless other times across the round ........there was no reason for the referee to blow his whistle

other than for Paul Gallen viciously kicking at an opponents face.

Did you actually watch it? Henry was holding on to Gallens leg while he was trying to play the ball. Gallens foot hit him in the chest when he was trying to shrug him off.

 

[Frank_Grimes]

Apologies mate, just saw on NRL game analyser. You are correct.

So from that game then - Lockyer lifting tackle penalised. Gallen leaping high shot let go.

What's your take on that?

 

[betcats]

So from that game then - Lockyer lifting tackle penalised. Gallen leaping high shot let go.

What's your take on that?

Good reffing all round.

 

[Mr Fourex]

Did you actually watch it? Henry was holding on to Gallens leg while he was trying to play the ball. Gallens foot hit him in the chest when he was trying to shrug him off.

:roll: ..........did YOU actually watch it??

"trying to shrug him off" .......FMD

The tackler can't vanish into thin air immediately after making the tackle. Henry was lying there no longer than 99% of other tackles made throughout the year.

Gallen gave Beau Henry all of 1 sec to get out of his way. Gallen could have stepped to the side and played the ball.

Instead he took aim......and purposely kicked/stomped on Henry.

He's a grub.

 

[THE CHAMP]

Scott couldn't even land a punch on Inglis when another player was holding him. I think the NSWanker brigade has gotten carried away with how hard this highly over-rated cheap shot artist is. Only gets selected because he's prepared to stoop to the grubbyest acts. Can't break the line or offload. Keep picking him tho, Inglis owns him. Just like Qld owns Nsw.

 

[DJShaksta]

:roll: ..........did YOU actually watch it??

"trying to shrug him off" .......FMD

The tackler can't vanish into thin air immediately after making the tackle. Henry was lying there no longer than 99% of other tackles made throughout the year.

Gallen gave Beau Henry all of 1 sec to get out of his way. Gallen could have stepped to the side and played the ball.

Instead he took aim......and purposely kicked/stomped on Henry.

He's a grub.

Interesting how your view contradicts all the Fox commentators who agreed Gallen should've recieved a penalty for Henry holding the leg too long.