SpaceMonkey
Immortal
- Messages
- 40,640
You think they’d pay even half of what they pay if there wasn’t an NZ team there?You think skynz are only buying nrl because of warriors despite them showing the other 7 nrl games every weekend?
You think they’d pay even half of what they pay if there wasn’t an NZ team there?You think skynz are only buying nrl because of warriors despite them showing the other 7 nrl games every weekend?
Celebrity/influencer endorsement is currently the most powerful marketing technique, and word of mouth the second. You'd also know that using the influence of famous supporters and owners to attract interest is the only hope the NRL has of making any sort of impact on the US market (even then it'd undoubtably be the equivalent of a pebble thrown in the ocean), and that strong word of mouth is their only hope of having a lasting impact.My completely 100% marketing brain went directly to locations Americans may have heard, or at least, sound as though they aren't within a 15 minute drive from each other - as well as utilising the "cool" mascots as if you were selling the game to a kid.
In this train of thought, it's why I personally wouldn't send across South Sydney and Sydney in the same year. It's a small thing sure, but if this is likely a make or break scenario I'd avoid any potential hazard in terms of optics or confusion.
I would've selected the teams listed below if the above was all that went into picking the teams and money/promotion from celebs wasn't a factor:
2024:
Penrith Panthers: Cool mascot, location a non-issue since Penrith is entirely unknown over there.
Canberra Raiders - Cool mascot, tie in with the LV Raiders/NFL, location mostly unknown.
Brisbane Broncos - Recognisable mascot, location might ring a bell as a city other than Sydney/Melbourne.
Sydney Roosters - Odd, likely humerous mascot to US fans, instantly recognisable city.
2025:
Melbourne Storm - Very American-esque team name, recognisable city.
Manly Sea-Eagles - Similar to the above in terms of mascot, location unknown to the US much like Penrith.
South Sydney Rabbitohs - Odd, likely humerous mascot to US fans, instantly recognisable city.
Newcastle Knights - American-esque mascot, location unknown but obviously different.
What did they pay before the warriors came into the nrl ?You think skynz are only buying nrl because of warriors despite them showing the other 7 nrl games every weekend?
Who knows? His assertion is that skynz are paying $32mill just for warriors games. Which is highly unlikely given the other 7 games rate higher combined by three fold than the warriors games.You think they’d pay even half of what they pay if there wasn’t an NZ team there?
In 1994 before skynz existed? In some different multiverse they were paying 400 million Sentra credits,What did they pay before the warriors came into the nrl ?
Not complicated at all, it's just got absolutely nothing to do with what we were actually discussing. . .Too complicated for you
nrl make massive profits from nz which they don’t reinvest back in nz rl
indeed Canberra benefit from this
Before the warriors the tv rights to nz were worth zilchIn 1994 before skynz existed? In some different multiverse they were paying 400 million Sentra credits,
Haha most Americans struggle to differentiate Austria and Australia, I’m pretty confident 99.9% of them have never heard of manly.
Warriors - cool name with exotic mascot, location whole other country which instantly makes the NRL look like a bigger deal compared to just another cityMy completely 100% marketing brain went directly to locations Americans may have heard, or at least, sound as though they aren't within a 15 minute drive from each other - as well as utilising the "cool" mascots as if you were selling the game to a kid.
In this train of thought, it's why I personally wouldn't send across South Sydney and Sydney in the same year. It's a small thing sure, but if this is likely a make or break scenario I'd avoid any potential hazard in terms of optics or confusion.
I would've selected the teams listed below if the above was all that went into picking the teams and money/promotion from celebs wasn't a factor:
2024:
Penrith Panthers: Cool mascot, location a non-issue since Penrith is entirely unknown over there.
Canberra Raiders - Cool mascot, tie in with the LV Raiders/NFL, location mostly unknown.
Brisbane Broncos - Recognisable mascot, location might ring a bell as a city other than Sydney/Melbourne.
Sydney Roosters - Odd, likely humerous mascot to US fans, instantly recognisable city.
2025:
Melbourne Storm - Very American-esque team name, recognisable city.
Manly Sea-Eagles - Similar to the above in terms of mascot, location unknown to the US much like Penrith.
South Sydney Rabbitohs - Odd, likely humerous mascot to US fans, instantly recognisable city.
Newcastle Knights - American-esque mascot, location unknown but obviously different.
Yes it doesNot complicated at all, it's just got absolutely nothing to do with what we were actually discussing. . .
Taking a profit isn't a crime either. They wouldn't do it at all if there was no profit to be made.
Sky would pay about as much for the NRL without the Warriors as they do for ESL, ie 2/10ths of f**k-all.Before the warriors the tv rights to nz were worth zilch
games were shown in nz too
They werent exactly worth a lot in australia either lolBefore the warriors the tv rights to nz were worth zilch
games were shown in nz too
So what your saying is that without an nrl team in America theres buckleys of getting any interest from usa tv companies?Sky would pay about as much for the NRL without the Warriors as they do for ESL, ie 2/10ths of f**k-all.
What are the esl rights worth anyway for Australia ?So what your saying is that without an nrl team in America theres buckleys of getting any interest from usa tv companies?
Completely different scale, the US is a huge market, they’d never pay serious $ for the NRL but even as a niche foreign sport in a market of 300M the revenue would be substantial.So what your saying is that without an nrl team in America theres buckleys of getting any interest from usa tv companies?
Hang you said nz would pay nothing without a nz club in the comp. 300 x nothing is still nothing! How many American people do you honestly think will get interested in rl due to a double header once a year? NRL is already shown on tv in usa but I’m not aware it has got any traction or that the deal is worth anything worthwhile?Completely different scale, the US is a huge market, they’d never pay serious $ for the NRL but even as a niche foreign sport in a market of 300M the revenue would be substantial.
My bad. When you said “2/10ths of f**k all“ I thought you actually meant it. I’ll be mindful to ignore you’re over exaggerations in future.God you’re a knob-end, I didn’t mean literally nothing, Sky would still screen the NRL and pay something for it, but that something would be a pittance.
60x a pittance though, that’s actually something.
f**k me dead, you must be fun at parties.My bad. When you said “2/10ths of f**k all“ I thought you actually meant it. I’ll be mindful to ignore you’re over exaggerations in future.
Depends what I’m drinkingf**k me dead, you must be fun at parties.