Jono078 said:Hagan probably didnt have 100% control over who he could negotiate with, but still he wasnt able to atleast convince the club to go for some decent players.
Brian Smith has been able to get decent players over the years, and the club must have trusted what he thought that player could bring to the team.Brian Smith got the players alright, at $300,000 +. How many players came to Parra at a reduced salary?
How many players did Brian sign at inflatterd figures? endless
How many players did he let go
How many players did he sign as replacements who were no where near at the same level?
Under Michael Hagan Newcastle when Andrew Johns played more then a dozen games made the finals, correct me if i'm wrong:
2001-Premiers
2002- Knocked out Joey does his back earlier on
2003- Knocked out, Joey injured
2004- Does knee mid season
2005- played half a year and since his return only loose 1-2 games
2006- made finals
Like any team, you take out the playmaker and the whole team takes a while to get over it, same happen with Newcastle.
Up untill 2005 Newcastle fans loved Hagan, it was only when they were crippled by injuries that they blamed the coach.
Dave Q said:Back to topic for a sec..
Smith will turn the knights into budding premiership favourites after a few rounds.
Lets hope the lunatics dont take over the asylum at Parramatta again.
JT is continuing his quest for excellence over at Souths.
He's introduced 1.5 hr scientifcially designed warm downs instead of the usual coldie with the fans behind the sheds. Some of the fans have been complaining!
BG said:I'm not the author, but I should clarify that it was posted to the Knights board as an "inside mail" update. As far as my decision to post the link here is concerned, considering the interest in the Eels/Knights coach swap, I thought it might stimulate some debate. Looks like I was right.
WTF are forums for? To agree wholeheartedly with everything? It shouldn't surprise anyone that it's Knights-biased; I clearly stated that it was from the Knights forum and provided the link. The post contains the (putative) opinions of Newcastle players and staff about Parra's new coach and the one he's replacing. Of course that's pertinent to the Eels board. Anyone who doesn't believe or disagrees with the info can either ignore it or state their case. That's the point of a forum.
Captain_Fred said:We already have our solution though, in Jarrod Mullen ;-)
Eelementary said:I'm not too fussed about Mullen. He seems "meh" talent to me personally.
However, assuming that he is a great young player (which I'm sure you Knights fans who watch him more often than me can say with certainty that he is),...it means little.
Adam Dykes - in 2001, Dally M 5/8 Of The Year and playing brilliant football.
Adam Dykes - from 2002 onwards...:?
He may have guys like Mullen at his disposal, but it's how he instructs them to play that is the concern.
Few people can legitimately say that Adam Dykes, coming off a superb 2001 season, wasn't an astute signing - and few can legitimately say he lacks talent. But look at how he ended up.
Eelementary said:I wasn't criticising you personally. I'm sorry if that's how it came across.
It's just that the actual author of the piece didn't to much of a comparison - it's all "Brian Smith is great, Hagan is rubbish". Not much of a comparison at all.
Ron Jeremy said:I don't think Mullen is any better then Josh Lewis or Jamie Soward at present tbh. Done some great things in firsts, but imo was inconsistent to be labelled as the man to take over Johns. Still has alot to prove.
IMO he proved that when Joey was out suspended late last year. Mullen took over the halfback role, and did something no-other stand in could - won games without Joey. We won back-to-back games against the Cowboys and the Panthers - not top quality opposition, mind you, but in the past, without Joey, we would've got our arses handed to us by those teams.Ron Jeremy said:I don't think Mullen is any better then Josh Lewis or Jamie Soward at present tbh. Done some great things in firsts, but imo was inconsistent to be labelled as the man to take over Johns. Still has alot to prove.
Struggled? In 2005, yes, as it was his first year, and he was still a little bit green. Last year though, as I said above, when Joey was out suspended, Mullen really stepped up and took control of the team.<UPtheEELS> said:I think Mullen struggles when Johns isn't there. It'll be interesting to see how he goes this year seeing as Johns will less lthan likely play every game. BTW Lewis is a much more better player than the other two you just mentioned.
Captain_Fred said:Money shouldn't prove to be a big problem, what with our reaching an agreement with Western Suburbs Leagues Club up here for financial backing. The club also has a brand new state of the art training facility at Club Phoenix at Mayfield. And recently they flew Smithy and a few other coaching staff and players over to NZ to gather some info from the All Blacks, in return for us training Piri Weepu for a week. So don't you worry your pretty little head about our financial and resources situation - we're a far cry from the team that almost had to declare bankruptcy in 2005
Ron Jeremy said:I don't think Mullen is any better then Josh Lewis or Jamie Soward at present tbh. Done some great things in firsts, but imo was inconsistent to be labelled as the man to take over Johns. Still has alot to prove.
Yeah, saw that this morning, and it gave me the sh*ts. It's our club CEO Ken Conway behind this...he's an absolute dickhead who:eelavation said:Interesting article in the SMH you should probably know about champ ;-)
http://www.smh.com.au/news/league/top-knight-falls-on-his-sword-after-coup/2007/01/31/1169919408044.html
Eelementary said:Smithy's a legend, but...
A plan after Joey?
If you know anything about Brian Smith, you would know that halves aren't exactly his specialty...