The T.V Rights Thread Part III

[hack]

You pop up out of nowhere to post in this thread.

You are a troll.

f**k off.

becoming a keyboard warrior is an enormous achievement. the inbred mentality of LU on full display.

patting each other on the back after seeing who could jizz the furthest after a circle jerk seems to be the only way to get involved.

 

[ParraEelsNRL]

becoming a keyboard warrior is an enormous achievement. the inbred mentality of LU on full display.

patting each other on the back after seeing who could jizz the furthest after a circle jerk seems to be the only way to get involved.

:lol::lol::lol:

Fraud.

 

[ParraEelsNRL]

Ffs, some people really know their stuff.

RL has been played in quarters before, I liked the mid week games, but stopping play at the 20, 40 and 60 min mark sucked big time and ruined the flow of the game.

 

[PaddyBoy]

He's been commenting on the NSW team selection thread and the ARLC report card, and even had a prod at Moffo about knowing how companies work, he just doesn't think it will get that much.

 

[Alex28]

& we have sucker numb 1 who believes everything he reads ............:lol::lol:

;-)

Nothing to do with reading any crap that the Telegraph dishes out.

The advertising dollars simply aren't there to warrant overpaying for the NRL rights. Nine can't afford to overpay - they have a $2 Billion loan to re-negotiate early next year and aren't making any real money. Seven have already overpaid for the AFL rights and it simply isn't worth their while to pay stupid money for it. Ten don't have the owners that will allow them to pay stupid money for the rights. Fox will simply wait and see who gets it because they have no competition - they don't need to pay stupid money for it.

I said all of this 12 months ago and the economic climate has got worse - not better. $1 Billion for the rights at the moment makes no sense for any of the 3 FTA stations. That is the problem.

 

[taste2taste]

But League and Soccor are the only sports in the WORLD not played in quarters!!!

So who do you support mate?

Your welcome to look at any of my posts over the past 5 years to see who I support.

Just some very simple facts that even you can understand

AFL has a 3 ½ min ad block between quarter 2 & 3 and 3& 4 = 7mins
At half time there is 3 ½ break at the start and the end of halftime = 7mins
There are roughly 26 goals a game which = 26 mins of commercials

Grand total of 40min of advertising space per game.

NRL
3 ½ commercial break at the start and end of half time = 7min
Channel 9 takes 3x30sec breaks per half = 3mins per game

Grand total of 10min of advertising space per game.

I know it sucks but NRL will never have a commercial TV deal as rich as the AFL’s

 

[El Diablo]

Grand total of 10min of advertising space per game.

you have obviously never watched a FTA game in your life

 

[docbrown]

Your welcome to look at any of my posts over the past 5 years to see who I support.

Just some very simple facts that even you can understand

AFL has a 3 ½ min ad block between quarter 2 & 3 and 3& 4 = 7mins
At half time there is 3 ½ break at the start and the end of halftime = 7mins
There are roughly 26 goals a game which = 26 mins of commercials

Grand total of 40min of advertising space per game.

NRL
3 ½ commercial break at the start and end of half time = 7min
Channel 9 takes 3x30sec breaks per half = 3mins per game

Grand total of 10min of advertising space per game.

I know it sucks but NRL will never have a commercial TV deal as rich as the AFL’s

Do you really believe that there are only 5 minutes of ads in the NRL per hour?

:lol:

 

[docbrown]

you have obviously never watched a FTA game in your life

I'm going to blame this on the Super Moon.

All the lunatics have come out.

 

[Karl]

Did the ": Poll : How Much will the Total Broadcast Rights Deal for the NRL be?" thread get merged with this one?

If the 40mins v 10 mins of ads analysis is correct,and I don't see how it can be surely? - that will make it harder for 9 etc to justify a really big number like the AFL, particularly if the view is that they overpaid for the AFL.

Is there any RELIABLE analysis of the number of ad minutes in AFL cf NRL on a per game basis?

 

[Ronnie Dobbs]

becoming a keyboard warrior is an enormous achievement. the inbred mentality of LU on full display.

patting each other on the back after seeing who could jizz the furthest after a circle jerk seems to be the only way to get involved.

Thanks. It hasn't been easy, but the internet is full of dick heads who give me the chance to sharpen my skills.

This is my 7th year as a keyboard warrior and I'm looking forward to many more.

Be sure to drop in so I can hone up my skills at any time.

I don't know anything about inbreds or inbred mentality, so I'm happy to take your knowledge on that subject too.

We can help each other out.

Now.

f**k off.

 

[Canard]

Your welcome to look at any of my posts over the past 5 years to see who I support.

Just some very simple facts that even you can understand

AFL has a 3 ½ min ad block between quarter 2 & 3 and 3& 4 = 7mins
At half time there is 3 ½ break at the start and the end of halftime = 7mins
There are roughly 26 goals a game which = 26 mins of commercials

Grand total of 40min of advertising space per game.

NRL
3 ½ commercial break at the start and end of half time = 7min
Channel 9 takes 3x30sec breaks per half = 3mins per game

Grand total of 10min of advertising space per game.

I know it sucks but NRL will never have a commercial TV deal as rich as the AFL’s

If thats the only criteria that TV stations will pay money for, why isn't Cricket worth $10B?

 

[docbrown]

Did the ": Poll : How Much will the Total Broadcast Rights Deal for the NRL be?" thread get merged with this one?

If the 40mins v 10 mins of ads analysis is correct,and I don't see how it can be surely? - that will make it harder for 9 etc to justify a really big number like the AFL, particularly if the view is that they overpaid for the AFL.

Yes it got merged and 40v10 is insane.

 

[taste2taste]

Do you really believe that there are only 5 minutes of ads in the NRL per hour?

:lol:

I can absolutely guarantee you those figures are correct for a FTA Friday night game, obviously there are more commercials in the delayed Sunday game.

This Friday get a stop watch…if you can count you'll find it's less than 3 mins of commercials in play.

 

[Canard]

He should know Doc, he once watched 12mins of League, whilst flicking over from Swans game.

 

[Karl]

The Daily Telegraph understands the deal would allow Nine to raise an extra $35 million in annual revenue by showing up to 12 commercials during a game, twice as many as they currently offer their advertisers.

So they currently show 6 commercials during a game according to this. Don't know how right that is either. 6 x 1 minute ads? 30 second ads?

If it is, it actually makes taste2taste's estimate of 10 minutes a game at the moment probably a littke on the high side - even if we're talking one minute ads.

 

[docbrown]

I can absolutely guarantee you those figures are correct for a FTA Friday night game, obviously there are more commercials in the delayed Sunday game.

This Friday get a stop watch…less than 6 mins of commercials in the game.

Only moments ago it was 10 minutes. :lol:

On Saturday post a list of all the commercials for this week - the time they started and ended - for both the 7:30pm-9:30pm game and then for the 9:30pm-11:30pm.

 

[ParraEelsNRL]

What really annoys me is the fact that RL outrates the vFL yet it doesn't receive nation wide exposure, it has 1 live game a week on FTA with a late night replay after. This is followed by a delayed game at 4pm on Sunday.

Yet the NRL still wins.

When the game gets nation wide coverage and has an extra FTA game, plus at least 3 of them live, the BS excuses some are talking about will mean zip. The vFL has had all this exposure for years while RL has had its hands tied behind its back, untie them and get on with it, we'll finally be able to compare the ratings properly and see which code actually is bigger on the box.

As the little foody mob have always said, it's not apple v apples. Yeah they were right, they would compare metros only and never thought about the non nation wide coverage, late night replays and the regionals that don't exist.

Even if RL doesn't get as much as the vFL this time, the next deal will smash them because the ratings for apples v apples will finally put the morons in their place.

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

so that's it is it? anyone challenging assumptions or displaying some degree of cynicism toward the reported $1b broadcast figure the NRL will attain is instantly a troll?

the whole point of a forum is to discuss issues and put forward opinions, even if they might not be popular. it doesn't mean anyone commentating in this way is instantly a troll, but it's this sort of shit, as well as degrading insults that some genuine rugby league supporters have to put up with on these boards.

we all agree NRL rates it tits off. the objective is maximising the revenue generating capabilities of the product for broadcasters, yet balancing this by maintaining what makes the game successful. as it currently stands, one or two 30-sec ads in 40mins of netwiork broadcasting thrown in inconsistently after an extended injury or other unscheduled delay of game makes it difficult for a FTA network to generate a reliable return on the investment for the outlay they will be asked to pony up to get them this time around.

The obvious question is;

What made you think he's talking about you?

Other than the fact that you're a troll, of course...

 

[docbrown]

Add those delays up and you will see that it equates to almost 20 minutes where ads could be placed (not that all of them will).

Now it's not necessarily going to be all of that but there's no way this "the NRL only shows less than 6 minutes of ads in game" yet will only have 12 ads a game even remotely makes any kind of sense.