What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The TV rights thread

Who would you like to see get the rights providing the price is right?

  • Seven

    Votes: 57 20.5%
  • Nine

    Votes: 49 17.6%
  • Ten

    Votes: 110 39.6%
  • Rights split between FTA channels

    Votes: 147 52.9%

  • Total voters
    278
Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...-rights-hardball/story-e6frg996-1225843487154

NRL plans TV broadcast rights hardball

* James Chessell
* From: The Australian
* March 22, 2010 12:00AM

THE creation of an independent commission to control rugby league will not alter the NRL's plans to use a sub-committee containing club representatives to advise it on the upcoming television broadcast rights negotiations.

The committee -- which includes Wests Tigers chief executive Stephen Humphreys, Bulldogs chief Todd Greenberg, St George Illawarra chief Peter Doust, North Queensland boss Peter Parr and consultancy LEK -- was established to ensure club involvement in critical broadcast negotiations before the present deal expires in 2012.

"It's a really good indicator that the NRL wants to involve the clubs," Mr Greenberg said.

"The change of ownership won't change things too dramatically . . . but it may mean negotiations are less convoluted."

Media group News Limited will relinquish its 50 per cent stake in rugby league as part of the creation of the single governing body, in a move partly aimed at ending accusations of a conflict of interest. News, which publishes The Australian, owns 25 per cent of pay-TV operator Foxtel, 50 per cent of the producer of Fox Sports and "rugby league newspapers" such as The Daily Telegraph and The Courier Mail. It will retain its first-and-last refusal rights for pay-TV until at least 2022.

The current NRL broadcast deal struck with Nine and Fox Sports in July 2005 is worth about $100 million a year and is regularly compared with the more lucrative five-year deal the AFL was able to secure in late 2005 when Seven, Ten and Foxtel were forced to match a $780m Nine bid by the late Kerry Packer. The NRL is expected to achieve a much-improved number this time given the popularity of rugby league in the growing Queensland market, the emergence of Seven as a serious bidder and the importance of mass-markets sports in a fragmenting media environment.

Mr Gallop said he would be prepared to increase the total price by selling parts of the game such as the high-rating State of Origin series, or to adopt the AFL approach and have the club competition broadcast on different free-to-air networks.

Seven chief executive David Leckie has set the scene for a tense round of discussions with his claim that his network -- whose shareholders include private equity group KKR and Kerry Stokes -- has the financial muscle to mount serious bids for AFL and NRL. For its part, Nine's private equity owner CVC Asia Pacific has been prepared to make big investments in television programs such as Top Gear.

Mr Gallop has said the AFL earns more on the free-to-air side -- where News Ltd does not have an interest -- and is keen to maximise the price paid by the networks likely to get a favourable outcome from Communications Minister Stephen Conrory's review of the anti-siphoning list of sport protected from pay-TV.

"We are certainly open to the idea of more than one free-to-air network (broadcasting rugby league)," Mr Gallop said. "But at the same time we recognise the value of exclusivity.

"For example, it is valuable that State of Origin gets talked about during Nine's coverage of the regular season. These are the sorts of considerations we must weigh up.

"There are obvious advantages to having the club competition on two networks because you are getting value inside the broadcast and in the exposure."
 

Quidgybo

Bench
Messages
3,054
The committee -- which includes Wests Tigers chief executive Stephen Humphreys, Bulldogs chief Todd Greenberg, St George Illawarra chief Peter Doust, North Queensland boss Peter Parr and consultancy LEK -- was established to ensure club involvement in critical broadcast negotiations before the present deal expires in 2012.
Who's looking out for the interests of coverage in Melbourne and the minor states as well as New Zealand on that committee?

Leigh.
 

rickyg.01427

Juniors
Messages
5
NRL has an audience in the U.K and pretty huge audience to be fair. The NRL has failed to sell rights in the U.K this year which is a shambles. I don't think that ESPN U.K thought yea we will have AFL but no NRL this year. Having the AFL in the U.K is as useless as a chocolate fireguard I don't even think we play that sport here and if we do its extremley amateur and only played by aussie ex-pats.
 

cocodmonkey

Juniors
Messages
3
Who's looking out for the interests of coverage in Melbourne and the minor states as well as New Zealand on that committee?

Leigh.

The way the networks are going at the moment they will only worry about looking after the areas where the most money can be made. Unfortunately the states you mentioned are not going to be high priority.
 

Greenbits

Juniors
Messages
434
Who's looking out for the interests of coverage in Melbourne and the minor states as well as New Zealand on that committee?

Leigh.

Agreed. At least three of those guys (Dogs, Tigpies, Saints) won't see a problem with the current inequitable level of TV exposure.

cocodmonkey said:
The way the networks are going at the moment they will only worry about looking after the areas where the most money can be made. Unfortunately the states you mentioned are not going to be high priority.
A little short sighted really. Clubs outside of Sydney and SEQ need exposure to grow their brands. By growing their brands, they potentially bring new supporters, and hence money to the pool. The current TV exposure is preaching to the converted.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,871
It might not be a priority for the TV networks but it sure as hell should be for the NRL! You can;t grow the game unless people actually have achance to watch it. As said i am sure national compnaies would be much more interested in sponsoring a club that has national exposure.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/n...elevision-rights/story-e6frfgbo-1225844025953

Channel Ten tackles Channel Nine for NRL television rights

* Phil Rothfield, Sports Editor-at-large
* From: The Daily Telegraph
* March 23, 2010 12:00AM

CHANNEL 10 has entered a $1 billion bidding war with rival television networks Nine and Seven to broadcast rugby league from 2013.

A high-powered executive from the Ten network recently met NRL boss David Gallop to privately launch the station's bid for the highest-rating sport on Australian television.

Gallop last night confirmed a meeting had taken place but insisted on his discussions remaining confidential.

Legally, Ten can offer only an expression of interest because Channel 9's current contract forbids the NRL to accept or negotiate deals before 2011.

Ten's sports boss David White would not comment when approached last night about the talks with Gallop. But he confirmed the network's interest by saying: "I'm not going to have our negotiations played out in the newspaper."

However, sources have revealed Ten, which last broadcast rugby league in the early 1990s, is preparing to challenge both Nine and Fox Sports for the rights.

Senior executives are believed to be working on a proposal to use the regular free-to-air channel and One HD to broadcast the NRL.

It would obviously force them to give up AFL, which it currently shares with Seven.

Channel 7, which launches Matthew Johns' new show on Thursday night, is the third player in negotiations that will see the rights fees double from the current $100 million-a-season that is divided up by Nine, Fox Sports and Sky TV in New Zealand.

As part of their current contract, Nine and Fox Sports both retain first and last rights for an extra five years.

A Nine source said: "Hell will freeze over before Channel 9 loses rugby league.

"They said we couldn't get the Olympics and we did. They said we wouldn't get the rugby union World Cup and we did.

"The only way we'll lose rugby league is if we don't want it and that won't be the case."
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
so now all 3 networks have expressed interest

the AFL rights are up first and if Ten miss out on those they will be desperate for something to put on One HD
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,871
will be interesting if Ch10 offer $1bill for exclusive rights (do they have that sort of money?) Would force Fox to offer even more or try and buy some games off Ch10 ala AFL. Fox knows it needs RL to remain viable. For Ch10 it could launch their HD channels to a whole new level.
 

pcpp

Juniors
Messages
2,266
Is this the first time that theres been a solid potential figure on the rugby league broadcast rights? $1 billion.

AFL have constantly been talking up $1 billion for its broadcast rights. With rugby league being the leading code on TV, there is no reason why the NRL can not get the biggest broadcast deal on TV. And the NRL CEOs should be talking it up.
 
Last edited:
Messages
3,070
That last sentence is interesting.

If the statement had some integrity to it, then it would seem to put mockery on the last rights tactic Kerry Packer employed on 7 with the last AFL deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top