What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The TV rights thread

Who would you like to see get the rights providing the price is right?

  • Seven

    Votes: 57 20.5%
  • Nine

    Votes: 49 17.6%
  • Ten

    Votes: 110 39.6%
  • Rights split between FTA channels

    Votes: 147 52.9%

  • Total voters
    278
Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
will be interesting if Ch10 offer $1bill for exclusive rights (do they have that sort of money?) Would force Fox to offer even more or try and buy some games off Ch10 ala AFL. Fox knows it needs RL to remain viable. For Ch10 it could launch their HD channels to a whole new level.

Ten need to get their arse into gear and have their main channel available in HD

i have no idea why they got rid of it entirely when they introduced One HD

dunno if Ten have a billion. maybe Rothfield made that figure up as there's no quote

that doesn't mean it's not worth that though as Masters pointed out last year

Double or nothing: Why the NRL TV rights are worth $1 billion
 
Messages
1,520
And this from Roy Masters today

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/all-eyes-focused-on-canberra-as-tv-shakeup-looms-20100322-qrb9.html

All eyes focused on Canberra as TV shake-up looms
ROY MASTERS
March 23, 2010
NRL fans will be guaranteed live free-to-air TV coverage of three league games a week, all finals matches and State of Origin and Kangaroos fixtures should expected changes to the anti-siphoning legislation be passed. The amendments will outlaw a media conglomerate using an internet provider to buy all screening rights and split them between pay TV and online coverage.

Channel Nine shows three games a week, but under the existing legislation Telstra could make a single bid for all rights and share them with its Foxtel partners. This could mean Foxtel, half owned by News Ltd and James Packer's CMH, would show pay TV games and Telstra BigPond would stream games online. Kerry Stokes's Seven network could televise Origin matches, but fans who do not have Foxtel or Big Pond would be denied free-to-air coverage of weekly matches in the NRL's Telstra premiership.

However, the federal government, concerned at the prospect of this monopoly bidding for sports rights, is expected to include the internet in its anti-siphoning legislation, categorising it with pay TV, preventing hoarding of matches whereby subscribers would pay for games streamed online.

''It would be bizarre not to include the internet in the legislation,'' one source said, suggesting free-to-air coverage of three NRL games a week, together with all finals and State of Origin and Kangaroo matches, will be enshrined in the legislation to be announced within the next month.

News, which holds the management rights to Foxtel and Fox Sports, has indicated it does not want an increase on the five NRL games it now screens a week.

While the Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, could override this, listing, say, six games a week for free-to-air TV, he recognises it would lower the return in rights fees to the sport. However, News' long-term first-and-last option over NRL and rugby union Super 14 screening rights is seen as a frustration to the federal government's anti-siphoning ambitions, particularly in an environment of constant technological change.

News, which owns half of Fox Sports and a quarter of Foxtel, holds NRL first-and-last TV rights until 2022 and is understood to have negotiated an extension until 2027 as a condition of its exit from the game. Nor has News paid for these rights, as Channel Seven did with AFL rights.

''It seems rugby league is all wrapped up,'' one government source said, appalled that the ARL would concede long-term rights to a powerful media entity whose control over first-and-last rights basically frightens away less wealthy competitors, lowering the bid and the fee received by the sport.

Furthermore, long-term ownership of the most popular product on pay TV - NRL games dominate the top 100 programs each year - is a powerful disincentive to another pay TV operator to enter the industry. This is why Canberra is closely monitoring the arrival of Fetch TV, a subscription TV service delivered via a broadcast signal over broadband, rather than from a satellite or streamed from the internet.

Backed by a Malaysian billionaire with widespread TV interests in Asia, it has the potential to challenge Foxtel and the regional service, Austar. Subscribers could potentially buy only NRL games, rather than be committed to a package of Foxtel programs they rarely watch.

It's possible fans of a particular rugby league team, such as the Dragons, could subscribe to Fetch's program of NRL matches involving only St George Illawarra.

Sensing this, some NRL clubs have become pro-active with their websites, with the Titans being the first sports club in Australia to stream an in-house produced show for a weekly half hour on Brisbane's Channel Nine, while the Dragons are hoarding exclusive internet content.

With NRL rights expiring in 2012, Fetch could entice Channel Ten to ditch AFL for NRL, given Ten's dissatisfaction with its current share of AFL programming. Its Saturday night coverage in Sydney is regularly out-rated.

Channel Nine joined with Foxtel to deliver the Vancouver Winter Olympics and will share coverage of the 2012 London Summer Olympics, but Stokes' investment in Foxtel and Fox Sports, via shares in Packer's CMH, threatens this relationship. Seven has made it clear it will have no business association with Fetch TV. It is negotiating with Foxtel for AFL rights. Seven boss David Leckie is a rugby league fan but government sources suspect he is interested only in State of Origin football.

Nine's Melbourne boss, Jeff Browne, said: ''We are interested in being there every week for the rugby league fan, not just the three nights of State of Origin football.''


Anything can happen.

To me the NRL will double its value during the next deal. Everyone wants it. No one is going to be scared away by nine this time, or be denied access to bid.
 
Last edited:

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Nine's Melbourne boss, Jeff Browne, said: ''We are interested in being there every week for the rugby league fan, not just the three nights of State of Origin football.''

f**k off

you're the AFL wanker who won't show league in Melbourne
 
Messages
1,520
Lets not forget this story....

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/nrl/why-nrl-deserves-bumper-tv-deal/story-e6frep5x-1225822324520
WHEN rugby league bosses open negotiations for a new TV rights deal this year, they should be armed with these compelling figures of the code's undersold popularity on the box.

Rugby union officials, however, would be inclined to feed them into the nearest paper shredder.

The annual Repucom survey of TV audiences for clubs across all four football codes has declared correct weight on a historic NRL quinella, with Brisbane and Parramatta attracting more viewers than AFL giant Collingwood in 2009.

In further proof the code's off-field dramas in 2009 had no effect on its appeal, five of the eight-most watched teams in Australian sport last winter represented the NRL.

Other top-raters were the Dragons, Bulldogs and Storm - and the premiers might have finished higher had Channel 9 not broadcast their Friday night games into Melbourne at obscene hours of the morning.



Furthermore, the figures only applied to regular-season games. Given the NRL Grand Final out-rated the AFL decider on a national scale, it's not out of the question that rugby league could have bridged the slender 400,000 viewer gap in combined audiences for the entire season.

It's no wonder the Bulldogs are standing firm on a $300,000 asking price for their sleeve sponsorship, which last year's occupant Bankstown Sports Club has refused to pay.

"We know it's worth that much because of the amount of exposure our club and the game in general is creating," Bulldogs CEO Todd Greenberg said. "We've had plenty of companies try to get it cheap, but we won't be budging below $300,000."

The fascinating rankings leave no room for speculation on the sustained power of free-to-air coverage.

Clubs from the two competitions without it - Super 14 and the A-League - were found wallowing on all of the bottom 12 rungs.

Most disconcerting was the performance of Australia's Super 14 quartet. Every A-League team bar the Wellington Phoenix finished above the Waratahs, Brumbies, Reds and Force, with soccer's overall viewership nearly double that of the rah-rahs.



Stats can be bended to mean a lot tho.

I would like the nrl to go australia wide this deal.
 
Last edited:
Messages
3,134
With NRL rights expiring in 2012, Fetch could entice Channel Ten to ditch AFL for NRL, given Ten's dissatisfaction with its current share of AFL programming. Its Saturday night coverage in Sydney is regularly out-rated.
I have a cousin who works for Ch10 and he says they are losing money big time by broadcasting AFL simply because they telecast Swans/Lions games into NSW and QLD during prime time.

Sort of makes me believe the next AFL TV deal should actually be much lower in value with the adding of Gold Coast and GWS. I mean what TV station would want to broadcast 4 dud (low rating) games a week into NSW/QLD ... and we all now the AFL will require this in the new deal. So by requiring this, their next TV deal should be lower in value OR conversely they would have to compensate the poor TV station that broadcasts these four games into NSW/QLD.
 

Lowdown

Juniors
Messages
1,062
Nine's Melbourne boss, Jeff Browne, said: ''We are interested in being there every week for the rugby league fan, not just the three nights of State of Origin football.''

Yep - you're there every week...at 1am or thereabouts...with a knife!

Deadset, this guy's a tool of the highest order. What are the chances he had a straight face when he said that?
 
Messages
2,579
However, sources have revealed Ten, which last broadcast rugby league in the early 1990s, is preparing to challenge both Nine and Fox Sports for the rights.

If Ten were to win would Fox lose all coverage ?
the danger I see in Fox in a bidding war would be they would have to bump all their prices up
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,814
Yep - you're there every week...at 1am or thereabouts...with a knife!

Deadset, this guy's a tool of the highest order. What are the chances he had a straight face when he said that?


And his dick in his hand too.
 

Lego_Man

First Grade
Messages
5,071
f**k off

you're the AFL wanker who won't show league in Melbourne

Theyre dishonest pricks. 9 is only interesting in sucking the schlong of the AFL and totally undersells League. Probably time to give another network a chance - one who will appreciate having the sport and might act in the interests of the game (let alone the terms of the damn contract!)
 
Messages
15,430
Seems every man and his dog are going to have a crack.

Finally league will get close to it's true value.

If only we had someone smart enough to promote T.V rights outside of Australia.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,335
Nine in Melbourne should at least show Friday night Storm games at midday the following day just so people can see it, but they don't.

I would be very happy if 9 was f**ked off from the rights altogether after all the years they've had the game on the cheap.
 

bobmar28

Bench
Messages
4,304
Nine in Melbourne should at least show Friday night Storm games at midday the following day just so people can see it, but they don't.

I would be very happy if 9 was f**ked off from the rights altogether after all the years they've had the game on the cheap.

Not to mention Peter Overtons hatchet job on league last year.

"Hell will freeze over before channel nine loses rugby league" I hope they have to pay overs to get it.
 

babyg

Juniors
Messages
1,512
So it is just News that get first and last bidding rights. Ch9 is not Newsltd. Do they only get first and last crack at the remaining 5 games that FTA don't get? I can live with that. FTA is where the money is. If ch10 decide they want a piece of it such as one Saturday night game, News have to match it. An extra 2 teams would help wouldn't it.
 
Messages
15,430
If league gets a bonanza TV deal it will mean more money for Clubs an increase in the Cap and more marquee players possibly attracted to our comp. League will become even more attractive to follow and ratings will be at an all time high.

It's a tricky one for networks to weigh up.
But if I was a T.V network right now I wouldn't want to be missing out on a ratings killer like rugby league that lasts for most of the year.

Time to pay up or shut up!
 

saint pebba

Coach
Messages
10,082
I think Ten and Seven are starting to see how well league rates on foxtel on a Saturday and Monday night and are thinking that it is well worth getting a peice of this.

There is no way Nine will lose Friday and Sunday league with the first and last rights but let's hope Seven and Ten drive up the price.

The best case scenario I think would be:
Friday - 2 games on Nine (same deal as we get now)
Saturday - 5.30 and 7.30 on Foxtel and 7.30 on Ten
Sunday - 1 Live game on Nine at 4pm and 1 Live on Fox at 2pm
Monday - 1 Live on One HD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top