That's ok, I think you're wearing a dick on your forehead, but mean no offence by that... :crazy:
It doesn't offend me because I do.
I actually like the Tigers, mainly because I like their attractive style of play. But they're stuck between a rock and a hard place (Dogs and Eels), and have no growth in them.
I don't actually care if you like us, it's irrelevant.
As for "they're stuck between a rock and a hard place", are you mentally helped in any way on a daily basis?
Do you know where Campbelltown is and do you know how huge a growth area it is?
Moving the Tigers risks handing over Campbelltown to Picton to AFL lock, stock and barrell for a start. Secondly, we've averaged bigger crowds than Parramatta for all of the past 6 years and 5 of the last 6 for the Bulldogs.
It would quite possibly be the stupidest move in Rugby League since someone looked at John Ribot and said "Yeah, let's give that bloke a job".
Another option would be Souths or the chooks, although they're slightly better positioned than Wests.
Neither of them are.
You're a barking imbecile.
Dragons, Dogs, Eels and Panthers are well established and have either support in numbers or the room to get them.
Dragons, Eels and Panthers have all averaged less than the Wests Tigers for the past 6 years (including this year).
Think about that statement.
How many times in the past 6 years has
your team made the semis?
Manly can't go, as it would leave a gaping hole between the CC and the nearest Sydney team.
But you'd be happy to give the South West to AFL?
In the immortal words of John Cleese : "You're a loony".
Apart from a few idiots who want to hang on to history or are too Sydney centric, everyone knows there are too many teams in the greater Sydney area, so who would you cull/relocate/merge?
Well, if you're anything to judge Saints fans by, Saints should be the first to go. But you aren't obviousy, you're a can short of a six pack.
You have no idea what you're talking about. None.