The issue isn't Hayne's ability. It's whether or not he gets given the opportunity to shine.
I know it's only game 2 but it's not out of the question to assume that Hayne will continue to receive limited opportunities. Unfairly so.
Unfairly so? That's the sport, you need to make every play count because you have such limited opportunities. He's not a better RB than Hyde or Bush, so he has to wait to get his shot. On PR/KR he needs to make sure he doesn't make mistakes or they will use someone else.
The NFL is brutal with cutting players, Hayne doesn't deserve any more or less opportunity than a rookie out of college. It's the nature of the beast.
To date, he hasn't done anything to guarantee an active position. His PR/KR has had limited yardage and two screw ups, people get cut for that all the time. At RB, he's had a single good 7 yard gain, again, no guarantee on his spot.
I find that American coaches are stuck in their ways and the opinion that Jarryd is just "a great story but nothing more" might stick. Similar to Kickalicious (research him).
It's a different sport to rugby league, coaches are stuck in their ways, because you have 48 players active on any given day, most guys see limited time on the field. You take notice of every single play. You don't get 80 minutes to make up for any mistakes. Currently on KR/PR he has a ~25% error rate and at RB averaging around 2 yards per carry. If an NRL player 'averaged' that in their 2 opening games, they too would be on shaky ground.
I hope I'm wrong though.
I'd just hate to see him waste his prime years as a minor role player in the NFL when he'd probably be the best player in league alongside JT.
Agreed, with that said, he's probably making more now in endorsements than he did in the NRL.