Soward went missing the whole time in attack great boot but far our he was hiding down the short side most the game so he wouldnt touch the ball..
well of course he wasn't.Soward played like he does every week. Kicked the ball well and apart from that wasn't cited
you must be delusional if you think
soward is anywhere near mitchell pearce's quality
you must be delusional if you think
soward is anywhere near mitchell pearce's quality
Pearce goes missing in games , he puts too much pressure on the 5/8 to do the attack , pearce is predictable he has only the kick in attack against defensive teams.
Roosters have shown they dont need pearce at halfback, carney won 4 out of 5 in at position , why roosters will struggle to win a grand final with pearce at halfback he isnt an attacking player in the games where teams lift in defence.
Pearce goes missing in games , he puts too much pressure on the 5/8 to do the attack , pearce is predictable he has only the kick in attack against defensive teams.
Roosters have shown they dont need pearce at halfback, carney won 4 out of 5 in at position , why roosters will struggle to win a grand final with pearce at halfback he isnt an attacking player in the games where teams lift in defence.
blake1979 said:He did set up a try in the grand final without kicking.
Yet. The kid is young, and has another decade playing top class football. It will come.
I would say, that although Pearce did do well for the try, it was more a result of Aubusson beating Cooper and Hornby than anything else