dice said:If some of the things I'm hearing about 2008 come true we'll see who is laughing and who is f**ked :lol:
Max Power said:Wing is an athlete, not a footballer. The last place you want him is in Half Back
Good luck with him in the #7. You're going to need it.
Baron Vo Mandor said:Its a huge throw of the dice by Souths, 4 years is a f**king long time especially if he fails to recapture his prior form.
Wing definately is not a halfback and only a hooker or utility IMO, great player in his day but too me his well and truly past his best.
Edit: I signing like this is definately a step back as it only proves that Souths are still the retirement village of the NRL.
Inferno said:Anyone know what his preferred position is?
Tonearm Terrorwrist said:should be interesting to note, if we don't make the finals, his last game for us will be against his future club, and his first game for his future club is most likely going to be his former club
interesting to note phil you didn't include
"... as it was a guaranteed 4 year commitment against the Roosters 2 years with a 2 year option. He also indicated that it would be his last contract in Australia."
does it seem so stupid now?
Tonearm Terrorwrist said:should be interesting to note, if we don't make the finals, his last game for us will be against his future club, and his first game for his future club is most likely going to be his former club
interesting to note phil you didn't include
"... as it was a guaranteed 4 year commitment against the Roosters 2 years with a 2 year option. He also indicated that it would be his last contract in Australia."
does it seem so stupid now?
Tonearm Terrorwrist said:should be interesting to note, if we don't make the finals, his last game for us will be against his future club, and his first game for his future club is most likely going to be his former club
interesting to note phil you didn't include
"... as it was a guaranteed 4 year commitment against the Roosters 2 years with a 2 year option. He also indicated that it would be his last contract in Australia."
does it seem so stupid now?
philstorm said:No no, i'm just talking about the money side of things. It just seems strange that, even if the length of the contract was the issue, the Roosters would indicidate on their own club website that money was not the issue for a player leaving the club?
Tonearm Terrorwrist said:good riddence, was a long time coming, only souths fans get excited by him, all parties involved are happy
mckinks said:Contract length can fluctuate (look at the latest wave of releases) but the money will stay the same. Besides, Four years isn't bad for a player who is still only 26 years old.
Does Roosters Management seem so smart now?
philstorm said:No no, i'm just talking about the money side of things. It just seems strange that, even if the length of the contract was the issue, the Roosters would indicidate on their own club website that money was not the issue for a player leaving the club?