I can see Billy Birmingham getting quite some mileage out her name...
Like he did with We Doping and Yay Wewon?
I can see Billy Birmingham getting quite some mileage out her name...
Of course she'd be drug free right now. I have no doubt that if she was juicing then the scientists back home would have made sure nothing would show up. The drug tests are always one step behind the dopers. I have no issue with her breaking her PB or the world record, but to swim faster than the 2 fastest Americans men? Please.
Imagine a female sprinter suddenly running a faster last lap than her male counterpart in the 3,000m or 1500m? That wouldn't happen, would it?
This point is absolute rubbish - have you even read this thread?
She has improved 5 seconds over 4 and a half minutes in a 20 month period ... there would be many 14 year olds who have improved their times to this extent ( or more) over a similar period to 16 years old...
doesn't the fact that she can split a 100 metres in the final leg of a relay quicker than Phelps means more to me than the fact that she has improved so much
Look at her most recent times then. You need to cycle on and off the drugs and doping is cyclical as well.
Apparently the chef at her local restaurant got confused and substituted the MSG with HGH.
If its the same testers that are looking after Ye Shewen then all should be fine.
We're all best served by a step back at this point. Tarring Ye with the doping brush by association isn't even close to fair. If this was an Australian athlete, we'd be mortified by the mere suggestion and celebrating the athletic vigour of our bronzed youth. It wasn't an insinuation Rice had to deal with when she clocked her world record in 2008, which was at the time an absurdly fast result.
Earlier that year, Rice shaved a startling six seconds off her personal best time to hit 4.31.46 at the Australian trials. American Katie Hoff reclaimed the mark a few months late before Rice countered at the Beijing Games, reducing it to below 4.30 for the first time. In contrast, people seized on the fact Ye reduced her PB by five seconds to claim the new mark of 4.28.43 as genuine grounds for suspicion.
The manner in which the races were swum adds another layer. Lochte had the race in hand by the time he turned on the freestyle leg. His other three strokes were good enough to give him a gold-medal lead and there was no clear and present danger ranging up on either side.
Ye had to hit the burners to motor past Beisel. She turned more than a body length behind and had to push with everything she had to catch the American. By the time she did that, it must have been clear a world record was within reach and she drove it home with Black Caviar authority. In any case, four other male swimmers did beat Ye's freestyle split.
Isnt it 50 metres?
Seems that Stephanie Rice had an even bigger improvement in her best time in 2008...
http://www.smh.com.au/olympics/swim...-question-chinese-success-20120731-23b6j.html
Interesting point that 4 other swimmers in the Mens final ( not Lochte) beat Shiwen's time over the last 50m...
I am a bit cynical that this publicity has come out to try and put Ye off her race tonight,,,
I hope the drug testers are all over the Rabbits this year....
40 years of failure, then all of a sudden some ( moderate) success....
Very suspicious...
.
How about this Uate? Big, strong and fast, but the Knights were doping 15 years ago so he must be suss too...
Isnt it 50 metres?