Very concise
Yep - Guptill is our Finch - happy for him to open in ODIs and 20:20, but he's not up to test cricket imo
Anyone else capable of during the job???
What I saw of Rutherford his technique looked looser then a Scott Boland spell.
Latham is still young and has plenty of time. Guptill is just shit.
Ben Smith & Jeet Raval. (Both had a bad domestic game at the wrong time).
And Dean Brownlie. So a lot of opening options not Rutherford.
No Rutherford, please.
How are we a chance of the #1 ranking with this dogshit batting line-up??
You're right on the money, Latham is *by far* our most promising test opening prospect since... well... Richardson? He needs to be persevered with, usually digs in impressively (or at least bloody well tries to).
Guptill might as well go for his shots. He can't play test cricket for jack... but without another opener standing up to be selected, him cracking a few quick fifties is better than nothing I guess.
Some people seem to be expecting a Kane Williamson ton every game.
Worrying though that when he does fail, our innings usually goes down this road.
I always dig at Anderson lately, the guy did at least occupy the crease last innings but he still looks generally pretty plod all around.
On another note, a guy I do always support, Neil Wagner would have bowled his ass off on this wicket. When conditions aren't in our favour we're so f*cking pedestrian, it would have been nice to have a lion hearted performer to call on. Henry non-selection also bizarre. Southee has done pretty much f*ck all since that epic 7-for. Surely it's time to give up on Craig too, Sodhi might have been interesting given his last performance.
Full credit to Australia who are giving us a royal lesson on how to play this game.
Rutherford is abysmal unless the ball is *exactly* in his arc (as England duly gift wrapped on his debut).
Brownlie worth a go, I really liked his Hobart knocks and that South Africa ton.
The rest are pure speculation, we have no idea about them.
Can't judge anything based on our very inferior domestic comp.
It's weird, but Guptill is actually one of our safer bets.
Why was Brownlie dropped anyway? He looked good when he toured aus a while back surprised he has not been given a shot at the top of the order.
Brownlie always looked a good prospect to me.
Nobody's arguing the better side is well on top, but just like Adelaide a screw up by the umpire has had a huge influence
You guys crack me up. You've been completely outplayed. You can't blame a single umpiring decision on that. Same as in Adelaide. There will always be the occasional umpiring screw up. If you're not good enough to overcome that then you're just not good enough.
Rutherford is abysmal unless the ball is *exactly* in his arc (as England duly gift wrapped on his debut).
Brownlie worth a go, I really liked his Hobart knocks and that South Africa ton.
The rest are pure speculation, we have no idea about them.
Can't judge anything based on our very inferior domestic comp.
It's weird, but Guptill is actually one of our safer bets.
You guys crack me up. You've been completely outplayed. You can't blame a single umpiring decision on that. Same as in Adelaide. There will always be the occasional umpiring screw up. If you're not good enough to overcome that then you're just not good enough.
Brownlie hasn't done much this year, I think.
I'd like Ben Smith in there. Be good to get Young around the squad too - Anderson and Santner aren't anything like test #6s, Neesham remains the best bet if we want an all-rounder there - think we're at the point where Watling has to bat 6 and the all-rounder 7. Australia are too, as bad as Anderson and Santner are they are more likely to do well batting in tests than Marsh