- Messages
- 100,998
I saw a couple of our new ANZAC jerseys yesterday, but not a single new heritage jersey.
It was disappointing as I was dying to see it in the flesh.
Complete opposite, saw plenty of heritage jerseys, no ANZAC ones.
I saw a couple of our new ANZAC jerseys yesterday, but not a single new heritage jersey.
It was disappointing as I was dying to see it in the flesh.
I saw a couple of our new ANZAC jerseys yesterday, but not a single new heritage jersey.
It was disappointing as I was dying to see it in the flesh.
Please don't peddle the 'no heritage' line to dragons or tigers fans.
It's in our blood and on our sleeves. Anything less is like suggesting souths have only existed since 2002.
As for the heritage strips, Balmain circa 1960s and magpies from the 1970s are this years links.
Fans love it. Yes, 2005 was novel, but simplicity and impact go hand in hand.
How is it not painfully obvious that the Dragons take advantage of St George's long and feted history?
Sorry Amadaca, but it's not black and white. The club and it's fans continue to incorporate the history of both clubs pre-merger into their history, as do the Tigers. Let them eat cake.
I don't mean to offend you guys. As fans you didn't choose to merge. Its just that this topic is close to my heart. I grew up as a fan of a club which merged, & it sickened me. I was never, ever going to support them, & Ialmost gave up League altogether before finding the Roosters.
As for the heritage strips, Balmain circa 1960s and magpies from the 1970s are this years links.
Have to say I don't see it that way
"Troll," has become the catchcry of the lazy & the glib.
Difference of opinion then. I think its having your cake& eating it too to absorb the Steelers & their playing talent & still try to pretend you can lay claim to St. George's history.
Difference of opinion then. I think its having your cake& eating it too to absorb the Steelers & their playing talent & still try to pretend you can lay claim to St. George's history.
Bears fan????
So was I.
The difference is that there was a deep seated hatred between bears and manly.
That merger was never going to work.
Are there pictures anywhere?
You can see it any way you like. All that matters to us is how we see it. St George never won a single premiership without the Illawarra. When the Steelers entered the competition and St George lost the Illawarra as a feeder area, they weren't able to win another premiership until the two areas got back together.
When a member posts inflammatory comments just to provoke a response, that is trolling. You need to ask yourself whether your claim that the Dragons have no heritage was true contribution to the discussion, or just an attempt to annoy Dragons fans.
Amadaca is fair dinkum Choc Watmough.
No-one else could be this stupid.
I never said they couldn't. I said they didn't.
My point was, that all of the premierships St George and St George Illawarra have ever won, were won while the Illawarra was part of the team.
Does anyone feel St. George-Illawarra have won 16 premierships after 2010?
Do you count the Northern Eagles as part of Manly's history?
*pics*
I see them as two different entities, which is what they are. St. George, & St. George-Illawarra. Does anyone feel St. George-Illawarra have won 16 premierships after 2010? Of course not. Do you count the Northern eEagles as part of Manly's history? Those clubs have just as many talent links as your guys.