ANTiLAG
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,014
Your argument is that the Big 3 are scared of China and making cricket an Olympic sport.
My argument is why would they care when China has had very minor success at any Olympic team sport.
I think the opposite would occur and they would welcome China.
Not my argument at all.
If you think so, then you are illiterate.
My argument for the ICC running interference to cricket in the Olympics was written expressly in plain and simple terms. The Big 3 do not want any further disruption to their home schedules. It is about money.
Fear of China was not spelled out, but is not fear of China's success at the Olympics, if any, it is fear of China establishing further T20 franchise cricket if the game becomes popular there.
And as for you thinking that the ICC cares about China's possible success at the Olympics, when the ICC does not even want to take cricket to the Olympics, is ridiculous. I seriously question your critical reasoning skills as well your comprehension.
The ICC is not a nation state, nor representing a single nation. Who wins cricket glory at a world cup or olympics is irrelevant to them.
The ICC members with BIG 3 governance has a vested financial interest short term to not grow the game further and distribute existing funds and Indian tours. India has a vested interest not to let a bigger economy into the game of cricket because of its IPL and the existing international scheduling. It is about money and scheduling. Not immediate success, or some success here and there. Money.
Last edited: