I agree but I just hope the NRL game gets more people at the ground the Suckka as if they don't the Ass League fans be bagging that A-League is bigger then NRL plus remember not that long ago the whole hype of West Sydney Wankers saying they were bigger then the Eels.
That's like the Swans saying they are bigger than RL in Sydney because their single club (Giants are irrelevant and half Canberra) has a higher average than all NRL teams.
Why? Every AFL fan in Sydney goes for the Swans, and 99% of Sydney primary NRL fans who have a vague interest in Victorian Rules would be bandwagoners for the Swans.
So yes, Sydney FC should theoretically have high crowds because they were the original A league team for a city of 5 million
AFL and A League: 5 million ÷ 2 teams = 2.5 million per team
NRL: 5 million ÷ 9 teams = 555,555 per team.
Yet each League averages around 14k in Sydney. Theoretically with less games and teams they should be higher if they claim to be "more popular". But our aggregate destroys them
In conclusion the fact that nearly all RL teams outdraw the soccer and are getting closer each year to the Swans shows just how big our game is in Sydney. It's just maths
RUGBY LEAGUE RULES IN SYDNEY, AND ANYONE WHO SAYS ANYTHING ELSE IS A LIAR OR SEVERELY DELUDED