Knightmare
Coach
- Messages
- 10,716
Some Grand Finals (indeed, many of them, like the '97 ARL Grand Final) have one team who almost everyone hates and wants to see beaten, while others (2004) despite being dubbed "the Grand Final everyone wanted to see" was the decider which had people by and large wishing there didn't have to be a winner. But which Grand Final, in your time following the game, would you say had the biggest "feel-good" factor to it, all personal bias aside?
My vote would be the 2005 decider. The Cowboys and the Tigers had both, fairly recently, been the competition's easy-beats, but leading up to that Grand Final they had both been playing entertaining football with some dynamos in their sides (Ty Williams, Thurston, Marshall etc.). It would be either clubs' first ever Grand Final win, and to whoever lost, just making it to the decider had been a great achievement. I was behind the Tigers that night, but had the Cowboys won I wouldn't have begrudged them one bit.
My vote would be the 2005 decider. The Cowboys and the Tigers had both, fairly recently, been the competition's easy-beats, but leading up to that Grand Final they had both been playing entertaining football with some dynamos in their sides (Ty Williams, Thurston, Marshall etc.). It would be either clubs' first ever Grand Final win, and to whoever lost, just making it to the decider had been a great achievement. I was behind the Tigers that night, but had the Cowboys won I wouldn't have begrudged them one bit.