One more explanation please bro.....
You say this backline 1. K Stanley 2. B Morris 3. Scott/Vidot/C Stanley 4. Cooper 5. Nightingale 6. Soward 7. Hornby......is ordinary or below average, despite you admitting it has 2 of the best wingers in it. But you rate this backline better.....1. Barba 2. Wright/Goodwin 3. J Morris 4. Lafai 5. Turner 6. Keating 7. Hodkinson.
Please explain how your doggies backline is better?
no problem, stanley hasn't proven anything, barba had plenty of hype etc and backed it up with a leading nrl try scorer. stanleys yet to do shit, morris is great, vidot is shit couldnt crack raiders, chase stanley is average at best, scott is in the backrow, cooper is past it and nightingale is great. soward had a top year a couple seasons ago and has been on the slide since with wayne got expect more down fall, hornby is shit.
i never said the dogs backline is great, though barba is top try scorer in the nrl in his first year at fullback and with his 2nd i expect him to be working hard in the offseason under one of the best coaches to fix his bomb problems and placing, turner is average, morris is a nsw and aus rep, lafai looked very promising but again has to prove it, lett/wright/mcdougal/goodwin are nothing worth mentioning, keating is shit, hodkinson is the best halfback out of either side.