drake
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,433
Another post that was blatantly ignored by the B'ogs fans on the NRL forum.
This question is for the Dogs fans who've been flinging the choke turd for the last week.
How did your team not qualify for a choke, considering the criteria that has been used to label the Dragons chokers has been met by the Bulldogs?
2005 - A star studded Dragons side lose the preliminary final to a lower placed team that had a red hot run to the finals is called a choke that spawned a permanent tag and a swag of lame signature pics.
2009 - Bulldogs do exactly the same with a sh*t hot side full of purchased stars and it's not a choke.
It's funny, two weeks ago, people are saying that the Dogs were the real minor premiers, had won the most games all year, and had lead the comp for at least the same amount of time as the Dragons.
Now, it's excuse time, and the Dragons were the comp leaders all year, the minor premiers and outright favourites and choked. The Bulldogs were second, and didn't choke because Parra were the better team.
Yeah the better team that Saints fans have been copping immature rubbish about losing to two weeks ago.
So we choked, and you didn't?
Please, give yourself and nice uppercut and cry yourself into a coma for the summer.
Neither team choked... two football teams were outplayed by better teams.
But if you're going to fling the sh*t, don't be surprised when you realise it's all over you.
Bad luck, and there's always next year.