Hayne must be Suspended

[hybrid_tiger]

The media bandwagon to let him off is already in full force. Sickening.

They've set the precedent with Gibbs, however no doubt they'll change their mind this time. Pathetic.

 

[Fui!!!]

Now Goodwin wants Hayne to get off!!!. You Sydneysiders make me want to VOMIT!!!!!!!!

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/league/2906736/Goodwin-vows-to-help-clear-Hayne


And Ennis, who is the biggest DOG in the sport throws his support in as well!!. F##K off!!!!!!!

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,26131287-23214,00.html

See, not everyone is bitter like you!

I'm gonna love seeing everyones reaction in an hour, when Hayne and Keating are cleared to play.

 

[NS_Sherlock]

Dropping the knees is normally a charge where a player has the ball and the tackler goes in on the player with the knees. In this case he was going in to a contest where the ball was on the ground from a kick, so another charge such as Dangerous Contact may be considered.

yeah, I considered that. Dangerous Contact possibly is an appropriate charge. You have to conider how hayne could have stopped. In any method there was possible contact and injury. We'll know soon.

 

[Fui!!!]

The media bandwagon to let him off is already in full force. Sickening.

They've set the precedent with Gibbs, however no doubt they'll change their mind this time. Pathetic.

Still hurting???

Gibbs would have got 1 week if he didn't have carry over points, and he didnt try and get off.

If his one was grade 2 dangerous contact and he was NEVER a chance at stopping Burt. Then Hayne's is DEFINATELY only a grade 1 dangerous contact seeing as he was chasing a grubber.

Whens the last time your team made the Finals?

 

[Eelementary]

Yeah yeah, he was never going to stop Goodwin from scoring, does that mean he shouldnt try and stop him?

Just go back to Nathan Cayless accidently kneeing Patten. It was clear that Patten was falling, Nathen then went down with him to make a tackle. Its almost the same thing except Goodwin was going to score a try, which requires more urgency from the defence.

Um, no, they're nothing alike.

And yes - he shouldn't have kneed Goodwin - at least I am not biased enough to admit that.

 

[Eelementary]

When you look at the replay he led with his thighs not knees, he will get off either way because he has no carry over points

Not if he gets a grade 2.

 

[Fui!!!]

Um, no, they're nothing alike.

And yes - he shouldn't have kneed Goodwin - at least I am not biased enough to admit that.

Why don't we just play touch footy?

You people are making the NRL more of a pansy sport than AFL. If you don't want an ACCIDENTAL knee to the head go play AFL or soccer or lawn bowls.

Let's make kicking illega aswelll, crocker got knocked out by kick. Whoever kicked should get a 5 month suspension. Dirty Grub of a player.

 

[Eelementary]

Blah blah blah. This isn't about the sport going soft ffs.

Fact - what he did is illegal and dangerous. You can brace yourself for a huge hit - what's a guy supposed to do when he's on the ground scoring a try and someone comes along and tramples his head with his legs?

Your bias astounds me.

 

[Fui!!!]

Blah blah blah. This isn't about the sport going soft ffs.

Fact - what he did is illegal and dangerous. You can brace yourself for a huge hit - what's a guy supposed to do when he's on the ground scoring a try and someone comes along and tramples his head with his legs?

Your bias astounds me.

Yeah yeah, thats not an exaggeration.

Theres a HUGE difference between purposely stepping on someones head and an accidental knee in a collision.

 

[sheet_ed]

Their is no ACCIDENT when your eyes are focused on his head - DOG ACT!!!

 

[Fui!!!]

Their is no ACCIDENT when your eyes are focused on his head - DOG ACT!!!

If Goodwins head is an advertising board

 

[Eelementary]

Yeah yeah, thats not an exaggeration.

Theres a HUGE difference between purposely stepping on someones head and an accidental knee in a collision.

No, there isn't. Both acts are suspendable.

 

[Noa]

Honestly Id like to see him play, but saying it was an accident is irrelevant. If we made decisions based on what was intentional and what wasnt, 98% of cases would get thrown out

 

[Ridders]

When you look at the replay he led with his thighs not knees, he will get off either way because he has no carry over points

I heard that he had 20% loading or something. No idea what that means. They'll probably give him a Grade 1 offense, which will allow him to down-grade it and play in the GF.

 

[markieboy]

Is the match review committee meeting today ot tomorrow?

 

[Eelementary]

Is the match review committee meeting today ot tomorrow?

11 AM today.

 

[markieboy]

11 AM today.

Are you sure? It's now 11.28am and there has been no news.

 

[Ridders]

He'll get a Grade 1. Book it in

 

[Eelementary]

Are you sure? It's now 11.28am and there has been no news.

Mate, it's not going to take 30 minutes to get a decision...

 

[Evenflow]

Mate, it's not going to take 30 minutes to get a decision...

They already made the decision after friday nights game. Grade 1 whatever and he'll get off. They're only waiting to add intrigue and to make it at least look they've had a long hard think about it.