Noname36
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,067
Eastwood > Smith
I think we need both. I've given up on us signing a good prop for next season, Eastwood would be ok up front I think.
We'll probably get neither though *sigh*
Eastwood > Smith
it's going to be interesting to see what happens with our pack with so damn many backrowers. you would have to imagine one or 2 will make a shift to the front row. they can't all play out wide.
ThisHe is 30...$300,000 for 3 years would be a disaster.
ThisEastwood for me as a supporter. Smith is 30 and is not worth what he wants. Smith is a very late bloomer. He was 25 when he started to make any progress at all under bellyache.
We need Eastwood more than we need Jeremy Smith.
Eastwood can play prop and Smith can't, right now our problem is the Front row.
I find it funny that Sims and White both off contract and both relatively young frontrowers and the club has said they haven't been approached