Iamback
Referee
- Messages
- 20,994
Everything the RLPA request comes at a cost
So yes its about money
And about a new suit wanting to muscle in
ex player needs operation, NRL will fund it. Still is money just not directly to the player
Everything the RLPA request comes at a cost
So yes its about money
And about a new suit wanting to muscle in
Can you point out which players have explicitly said strike action is possible?I’ve seen players themselves say strike action is possible when the reality is they are no chance of doing it
I’m tired of clubs and players putting the game through the wringer and crying like babies until they get what they want
players don’t care about the game itself anymore which is sad
when I started watching the game they were way less selfish than the prima donnas of today
Can you point out which players have explicitly said strike action is possible?
And I'm not referring to boycotting media days or similar. Which players have said "we will consider strike action"?
The extent of what he said, to my understanding, was. "The longer this CBA drags out, the worse it’s going to have an effect." That's about as close as he got.Capewell said all options are on the table
But its a player cost even if ex-playerex player needs operation, NRL will fund it. Still is money just not directly to the player
Their response officially isSo has the RLPA come out and refuted they won't strike?
Because if they haven't then the perception by the public will be that they haven't ruled it out.
as it should be. No point holding a gun to someone’s head if they know it’s not loaded!Their response officially is
All cards are on the table
Their response officially is
All cards are on the table
But is a player cost even if ex-player
And now the question is is this in their 34% requests
Or us 34% really 45% when include things like FBT
I’m sure it’s above and beyond cap level. A $12.1mill cap is around 32% of predicted $600mill revenue for the men. An extra 2% would only be $700k per club on the cap. An injury fund would cost much more than that.Which is my questioning as to what they see the end result of the injury fund. Part of the 34% or on top
I’m sure it’s above and beyond cap level. A $12.1mill cap is around 32% of predicted $600mill revenue for the men. An extra 2% would only be $700k per club on the cap. An injury fund would cost much more than that.
The extent of what he said, to my understanding, was. "The longer this CBA drags out, the worse it’s going to have an effect." That's about as close as he got.
Journalists tried pressing him on it and he said "Hopefully it doesn’t come to that.”
Doesn't sound to me like they want to strike.
I guess that is where the current argie bargey is. Presuming the commision are not dismissing the concept of a reitred players support fund out of hand.So how much more are we talking? There is not a lot of detail around it. Aaron Woods again said the cap figure is fine. so are they looking for 40% overall?
My logic was sound. It's your ridiculous response that threw it all a skew.Oh yea. All professional rugby league players are on contracts paying them a few hundred thousand a yearNone of them are ever paid the code's minimum wage, which is (IIRC) under A$100,000 p/a.
Also by that logic, you are effectively syaing in any field where people pay to watch others perform entitles them to a say in that person's emplyment entitlemnets means professional tennis players, basketball players, golfers, actors can all be dictatde to by fans when something happens they don't like? I mean, really?! What next, fans vote on who should be in the starting side next week? Sorry but your logic on this point is rather ridiculous.
The $5 mil for football operations cap is seperate from the player NRL Top30+6 and NRLW Top 25 salary capsOn the clubs, the nrl has a proposed salary cap of
$11.45mill top 30 players
$650k development players
$884k nrlw
total nrl and nrlw player payments $13mill
are clubs asking for $5million above this, or just above the mens cap?
If full amount Will clubs without nrlw teams get less?
Or is it above mens cap and then clubs running nrlw teams will get a seperate grant on top of the $17.1mill as they did last year?
Yes wasnt including the football club cap (is this still even a thing? Never heard anyone mention it or breaking it)The $5 mil for football operations cap is seperate from the player NRL Top30+6 and NRLW Top 25 salary caps
Grants are designed to cover all of these amounts, thats why the 130% grant was agreed
Clubs technically pay all of players & coaching staff club commitments from that amount
My logic was sound. It's your ridiculous response that threw it all a skew.
No one said all of em made a few 100k a year. That's your own shit take you're eye rolling at.
You said we'd be outraged if our normal jobs had people outside the industry having a say on things. You can't compare because my job doesn't exist solely for the entertainment of others. If no one wants to watch these merkins work they're worthless, so I'd argue they've gotta take that stakeholders thoughts onboard a little more.
Entertainers live and die on the opinions of the fans. A career could end tomorrow over a tweet you made a decade ago. You reckon it was the NBA players who got together and decided to play on Christmas Day or you think that might be geared towards giving the fans what they want?
If salary cap is $11.45 mil plus $883k plus $640k or about $13 milYes wasnt including the football club cap (is this still even a thing? Never heard anyone mention it or breaking it)
Was interested if it’s $5mill on nrl mens cap level or $5mill on top of nrl + nrlw cap level?
ie $17.1mill or $18mill to clubs?