Quigs
Immortal
- Messages
- 34,396
Swinging voter my arse!! :lol:
I answered all the questions in good faith and had my fingers crossed.
Funny thing was the bird asking the questions was agreeing with everything I said.
Swinging voter my arse!! :lol:
the bird asking the questions was agreeing with everything I said.
Ive only been polled once Cardy, and that was based on the NBN.
I think you know which way I voted.
Told em I was a swinging voter always had been, but the NBN had swung me strongly to Labor.
Are you surprised after people like Quigs rape the economy dry with their "me me me me me me me. but I wont spend atitude"?
I recall kevin used to leave an aircon run 24/7 to give the appearance an investment property was being used so he could avoid stamp duty.
Ah here it is
In May 1994 Mr. Rudd and Ms. Rein purchased a property at 41 Dilkera Street, Hawthorne from a Mr. Tom Allen for $240,000. The solicitors were Goss Downy & Carne and the stamp duty of $2,400 returned on a solicitor's return stamping (as confirmed by a copy of the stamped transfer document from DNR).
. In November 1994 the Rudds entered into a contract with a Ms. Nicole Noble and the property was settled at the end of January 1995 for $280,000.
. A check with the neighbors confirmed that the Rudds had never occupied the premises. The neighbors were reportedly not impressed by the Rudds.
. The house had a room air-conditioner, which was left running 24 hours per day, even though the house was unoccupied.
. Neighbors complained about the noise from the air conditioning unit running 24 hours per day.
. Mr. Rudd approached the original owner Mr. Tom Allen regarding instructions on how to operate the air-conditioning time clock.
Armed with this information Mr. Rudd was then queried by The Courier Mail, regarding the stamp duty claim:-
. At first Mr. Rudd claimed that he lived in the house and met the PPR qualifications.
. On further contact by The Courier Mail, Mr. Rudd claimed he had contact with an officer of the OSR regarding the non-supply of a signed form "Q" (stamp duty PPR exemption form) and quoted dates, telephone conversations and correspondence with an officer named Noel ***** of the OSR.
. When pursed further regarding the matter Mr. Rudd finally admitted that he did not qualify for the PPR claim and paid the additional stamp duty (about $4500) on 4/11/94 and quoted a receipt number.
This was about two weeks after I reported the matter to the OSR and under the Office guidelines a penalty should have been imposed. In fact the facts are not dissimilar to cases prosecuted through the magistrates courts. (REFER to ATTACHMENT J). Mr. Rudd should have reported his changed circumstances (from the date of the leaseback of his original house) within 28 days of those changed circumstances.
. During further conversations Mr. Rudd finally stated or words to the effect that "Goss had told him that this disgruntled merkin from the Revenue Office had dobbed him in".
These comments are on tape (I have not listened to the tape, however it would be available under discovery) and cannot be withdrawn by Mr. Rudd, The Courier Mail has been told that the tape represents evidence and must not be destroyed. The tape has been transcribed.
There is another fact, which I should point out. The OSR in 1994 and 1995 was carrying out a computer data matching process with SEQEB electricity records. The records were crossmatched to ensure that the owner of the premises actually occupied them and that the SEQEB account was not just for a minimum charge. It is apparent that Mr. Rudd was made aware of this process and this is the reason why the air-conditioning unit was left on 24 hours a day. It seems to demonstrate intent.
Whilst he did not name me in person, Mr. Rudd was certainly given the details of my OSR dob-in report. The question then exists as to who passed on the information to Mr. Goss. There is not a great choice of suspects.
The normal chain of reporting matters would by via the Under Treasurer. Whist I don't hold Mr. Bradley in high regard, I don't think he is that stupid either. Ms. Macdonnel, on the other hand, just can't contain herself, as I have demonstrated. There are additional facts, which support this view, which I cannot disclose to you.
The fact that the Dilkera Street Property was not owner occupied and sold for a $40,000 profit after being owned for six months also raises the question of capital gains tax.
As you can see, the Heiner case just keeps going on and on and gets worse and worse.
http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/goss/oneill.htm
Sneaky merkin :lol:
Hey quigs you know how you always talk about Abbott's news ltd meetings, do you think Abbott could be the godfather of one of news Ltd's editor in chiefs child or would that be Rudd ?
Its not a political football now Shadow. It is legislated law. Passed through both houses of the Federal Parliament.
But if you want to see how politicised the matter was...
I will show you how munch The Gutless Sloganman and his Team supported the passing of the National Disability Insurance Scheme...
The first pic was the introduction of the Levy into Parliament
![]()
The 2nd pic was the passing of the legislation ...
![]()
Yeppers there Shadow... it was a proudly supported bipartisan approach would you not say.
For those dumb as dogshit the Coalition benches are to the left of the pic. You didnt see those pics in Rupes rags.
Bastard what you dont realise that NDIS was and is life changing reforms into the future. It's big, and very very important.
The only reason a lot of the Noalition were not present in the chamber was because they were directed by the whip on behalf of their cockhead leader and his chief of staff not to attend.
You can back that in
So pharken what dopey?!!!
You'd be the sort of bloke that would run water for St George or Manly if they promised the Sharks a win.