lucablight
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,529
Metres made by backs don’t count?What point are you trying to make and how do these numbers support it? Penisini made over 200 metres last night. It doesn't say much about our pack.
Metres made by backs don’t count?What point are you trying to make and how do these numbers support it? Penisini made over 200 metres last night. It doesn't say much about our pack.
Who's giving excuses? I'm saying you're off your tree trying to pin it on Jake Arthur.
Their two best metre gainers were Papenhuyzen and Munster. Four of their top five were edge players, much like us last night. Melbourne should win nearly every time they play us, but they take us lightly and try to go around us. Sound familiar? It's a recipe for disaster. I hope it happens in the finals.We didn’t though. Melbourne we’re statistically the better side when it came to yardage and possession.
lucablight asked publicly so I answered him publicly. Thanks for the advice though. If you don't like his questions maybe send him a DM letting him know how you feel?Then maybe keep your questions to yourself, or to DMs to the forum members who you're quoting/asking the questions of?
A did say grand final wins, not premierships. But also, being in a position to cheat like that (illegally retaining players they had poached as youngsters) is a sign of how strong they were/are. They have obviously perfected the art of retaining players 'legally', although they're still not as dominant, as shown by their inability to make four straight grand finals ever since. The best they managed was 2016-2018 (for only one win).Storm**
ffs pou
It's not the lack of resources I'm talking about, it's the abundance of resources available to the clubs who have won multiple premierships. That's the point I'm making. It's good that weaker clubs are a chance of arsing their way to a premiership when the stars align, and hopefully it happens for us. But the experience of the Roosters and Storm (and to a lesser extent the Panthers) over 20 years points to the problem. In that 20 year period we have lost 11 finals matches:If you want to go back to 2001 then it’s 12 teams that have won a premiership out of 16. I challenge you to find me another elite sporting competition where 75% of the teams have won the competition at some stage. It just shows that blaming a lack of resources is a copout when so many teams have done it at least once in recent memory.
Team | Finals wins over Parramatta since 2002 |
---|---|
Storm | 6 |
Cowboys | 2 |
Broncos | 1 |
Panthers | 1 |
Rabbits | 1 |
No he was a utility. He played fullback, centre and five-eighth (48 games at this position).Inglis wasn’t a 5/8 you dope.
The bloke who Bellamy moved from fullback to five-eighth? Fancy all these great players being able to play multiple positions. Dylan Brown is in good company.But you didn’t answer my question regarding Munster.
Only sometimes. We outplayed the Penrith pack in last year's finals. Just our backs weren't good enough to capitalise. But it was anyone's game.Finally ffs. And we stink at it. Period.
* Mostly.Only sometimes. We outplayed the Penrith pack in last year's finals. Just our backs weren't good enough to capitalise. But it was anyone's game.
Not really because the number of runs where some merkin doesn't get tackled (like scoring a try) is insignificant over the course of 80 minutes of rugby league. It will make no difference to their level of fatigue. It's just the f**king dumbest simile any rugby league watching dope has ever come up with.It’s like asking how shoulder barging a door is more effort than using a key to unlock it because it’s the same door.
Not when judging the platform laid by the forwards. Good platform laid by the outside backs though I suppose, but maybe we'd rather them make line breaks and score tries?Metres made by backs don’t count?
It was in response to you belatedly claiming your question was a rhetorical one... you're so high on keyboard fantasies you don't even know what argument you're trying to start or reply to any morelucablight asked publicly so I answered him publicly. Thanks for the advice though. If you don't like his questions maybe send him a DM letting him know how you feel?
And I don't think I've seen one person ask you a question publically... You don't have to answer ever public post that appears in the forum - unless for some reason you're trying to fill a gap in your life?lucablight asked publicly so I answered him publicly.
What a shit post. Again.Who's giving excuses? I'm saying you're off your tree trying to pin it on Jake Arthur. Our effort was poor against the Tigers (when Arthur didn't play) and last night, when Arthur tried his best. You seem to think that whenever we lose it's some kind of massive win for the whingers. What did it prove? I won $80 on the game. I knew we might've lost. You should have too.
And here's a tip, we're a good chance of losing next weekend as well. Our left side will get carved up no matter who we put there, and if we don't control the ball our middle defence will collapse because the Panthers forwards are too mobile for us.
Pou and credibility?It was in response to you belatedly claiming your question was a rhetorical one... you're so high on keyboard fantasies you don't even know what argument you're trying to start or reply to any more
Take a rest from it mate, you're fast losing whatever credibility for being a "thinker" you seem to think that you have,
Players weren't squaring up the line when we were doing it to make the defenders guess.
Had a mate that used to play touch footy like that. Gave me the shits.
Probably Brad Arthur's decision, on advice from Jake.
He carves up in reserve grade and has NRL level defence. Definitely worth a spot at the bottom of the top 30.
Should've done it the other way around. You'd be feeling better and whinging less.
*spelling