jeffdragon
Bench
- Messages
- 3,927
And if friz didn't steal the ball
Alot of ifs led up to that .
Cant change it unfortunately
Alot of ifs led up to that .
Cant change it unfortunately
Because that was an error, not a decision as per Benny Hunts mad decision not to kick.I don’t understand the conjecture here with the “maybes” or “could haves”.
The bottom line (to me at least) that’s far more pertinent is Au Mau getting stripped of the ball. If he had better ball security, obviously, this thread wouldn’t exist.
I would put Pearce in front personally.He's basically the same as Pearce. People just don't want to admit it.
You can talk about what he can or might have done. Fact is he didn't, same as Pearce.
They are both good players when everything is going their way , but when its not that is where they struggle ..... Lets hope Benny finds his mojo .....I
I would put Pearce in front personally.
He's basically the same as Pearce. People just don't want to admit it.
You can talk about what he can or might have done. Fact is he didn't, same as Pearce.
After seeing the replays of the last set, although it didn't come off, it was good to see they had the balls to roll the dice....even though they got the execution wrong. Was it the wrong play at the wrong time - probably but at least they went for it.
I think it would've been tough to get the win, had it gone to extra time as we were out on our feet.
I had more of an issue with Ah Mau getting stripped of the ball so easily.
Was a low percentage play but under the circumstances I can understand why he went for it.After seeing the replays of the last set, although it didn't come off, it was good to see they had the balls to roll the dice....even though they got the execution wrong. Was it the wrong play at the wrong time - probably but at least they went for it.
I think it would've been tough to get the win, had it gone to extra time as we were out on our feet.
I had more of an issue with Ah Mau getting stripped of the ball so easily.
As one of the resident optimists that is how I see it. Sure the high percentage play was the long kick. But we were shot, I’d bet plenty Souths would’ve won from there anyway. But nail that play, put field in space with Lafai, JP and Hunt in support and very good chance we score and win.Well I guess if you’re looking at positives, the fact he had the balls to try it bodes well for next year.
Who knows if Widdop had been there it may have come off if he got the ball by mistake. Perhaps he would have simply catched and passed.
Not gonna crucify Mann however, he’s definitely not expected to be the player to nail that play, despite what many in here think.
As one of the resident optimists that is how I see it. Sure the high percentage play was the long kick. But we were shot, I’d bet plenty Souths would’ve won from there anyway. But nail that play, put field in space with Lafai, JP and Hunt in support and very good chance we score and win.
And I’m certainly not wanting to crucify Mann, but it honestly looks to me that he could and should have been able to make that pass.
Was a low percentage play but under the circumstances I can understand why he went for it.
We were losing the arm wrestle badly, they were rolling through our middle with ease. We were out on our feet and Hunt knew it. It was an all or nothing play which could have come off had the execution been better.
Yes he could have kicked long and sent it into 20 min extra time, but the momentum was all with souths.
Yeah I agree. I do think it’s a little curious that some of the same people saying there’s no way Mann could make that pass also advocate for him to be first choice centre. Surely you’d want a centre to be able to make that play to put their winger away.Yep. 100%
That’s why I raised it in JA what would happen it we had Widdop playing the Mann role in that movement.
I’m guessing as an international half, he has the composure to catch and pass in that split second, even if he did get the ball by mistake. That’s the difference between good and great players.
Mann unfortunately proved once again he’s nothing more than a fringe first grader and certainly not the guy to adjust and make the right play in that instance.
Harsh but true unfortunately.
Yeah I agree. I do think it’s a little curious that some of the same people saying there’s no way Mann could make that pass also advocate for him to be first choice centre. Surely you’d want a centre to be able to make that play to put their winger away.
They were running a block play and Mann is running an unders line, there is no way anyone getting that ball while they were running that line were going to pass it to Field. Especially, as Field arrives late (which is what he should have done) and if he had received the ball they probably score.
Hunt picked the wrong runner but in the heat of the moment with a split second to make a selection he thought Mann was the best option. In hindsight it wasn't, but that is footy, the best option will not always be picked in real time. The fact is that was a play that nearly won them the game.
Exactly.
It's all hypothetical, but look at it this way. Hunt OR Mann kick the ball down into the corner. 3 things could have happened.
If we go into extra time, given the ease with which they were making ground, we really didn't have it in us to stop them from scoring OR for us to score for another 10 minutes. So we had to have more points than them at full time. And if we were lucky enough to get a mistake, Hunts ability to kick field goals is well known. There's a risk there.
- We keep them down their end and they punch it back down our end at the end of the set. At that point of the game we weren't getting to halfway so likely we would have gone into extra time (ie no chance to kick a field goal).
- They make a mistake and we get a chance at a field goal.
- They roll through us - again - and get in position for another shot at field goal.
Second option, run it on the 5th. There was a chance. Hunt played what was in front of him and the execution failed. I don't begrudge the choice and if it had've come off, we win and he's hailed a hero.
So many choices in a split instant. The one thing that didn't need choices was LAMs ball carrying. Given there were already 3 or 4 strips prior to that in the game and numerous other attempts, and the current score, holding onto that ball was imperative. That should have more scrutiny.
Having said all that, there is a noticeable change in attitude when Sims went off. That's where it started to go down hill.
I thought Ah Mau getting stripped was the defining moment. A two arm carry was what was needed by a prop at that time. He holds the ball & a couple of tackles later we’re down on their 20.
I am not going to slam hunt.Hunt gets the blame by the press for losing the game but not for putting them in front for most of the game with the ONLY try Saints scored. Not many halves score that try. Imagine if Saints still had McCrone? The press are brutal when it comes to Benny.
I really hope there is a thing called karma because if their is about time it goes the other way and Benny wins us games which I am sure he will in his time at the red v. If Saints win against Souths he would have been hailed as a legend and that try he scored will actually get some mention. They lose by a point and you would not even know that he scored it. Sad.