- Messages
- 62,358
you find that Defenders position is based on those either side of them. If a centre doesn't move up (AYshford) then the next defender in does not commit to a tackle, that usually helps draw the centre and the next inside defender and create a 2 on 1 opportunity for the attacking team against the defending sides winger.so why do they all defend badly together?
is it the system, or are they poor in defence, if so why are they all grouped in the same spot?
Luke Brooks is a poor defender, but he commits to a tackle and its enough to force the attacker to pass early and prevent an overlap.
Carney tends to be running across as a cover defender more than anything, and as he is never committed to tackling anyone, it helps the attacking side to create an overlap.
Ayshford hesitates, as I said, based on his bad habit at the Tigers when he had to cover for Moltzen's crap inside defence. He was wrong to do it then, and he's still doing it now.
So you have Carney in the front line, running towards the wing, not the attacker, acting like a cover defender, Ayshford standing back to cover his inside (which the sliding defence can cover)
This forces the winger to follow Ayshford so as to try and prevent a gap between centre and winger, but it creates an overlap.
If the inside defenders slide faster, it will prevent Ayshford from heading in field.
If Carney runs to an attacker and attempts a tackle, he'll force an early pass and prevent Ayshford going in-field.