Thursty gets off

[El Diablo]

Yeah ok.
Thurston had koopu at 45 degrees.
Inu had bell at around 80 degrees.

you seriously need a new protractor

 

[Mr Saab]

 

[El Diablo]

In your "completely" unbiased eyes, do you believe that Inu should have been charged for that tackle....comparing that tackle to Thurstons.

no

I dont give a shyte about the Cowboys so dont accuse me of bias as he is a QLDr.

you're not a Queenslansder so wtf are you on about :?

 

[jimmyo]

YES! I hope he carves Manly up into tiny little pieces. Great news!

 

[Mr Saab]

no

I rest my case about you and bias.

you're not a Queenslansder so wtf are you on about :?

I know, but you know i have not love for NSW.

 

[Andy Capped]

Now lets hope the judiciary can get menzies' virus downgraded....

 

[Dragonsforthewin]

havn't read the whole thread but..

IF IT WAS RYLES.........

 

[jabroni]

Anyway onward and upward
Bring on JT and the Broke Back Mountain Boys!!!!

Spear chuckers! Imagine a mother seeing that tackle and the player not being suspended for it. Something with a small margin for error, realistically, the result could've and has been alot worse with player suffering terrible injuries from tackles that started the same way and ended a few degrees worse. I would not want my child playing football knowing that something like that should only deserve the same punishment as having your hand in the play the ball.

Absolute joke, then they wonder why we are losing more kids to afl, which have all but eliminated dangerous contact in their tackling. Disgraceful!

 

[_Johnsy]

saab

Well I can't argue with that.

 

[El Diablo]

I rest my case about you and bias.

so because i don't agree with you i'm bias lol

great case you're trying

I know, but you know i have not love for NSW.

then why have you spent your entire life living here?

move

 

[Raider_69]

awesome news

 

[Mr Saab]

so because i don't agree with you i'm bias lol

great case you're trying

Inus tackle was fine was it? Based up how they talk about going past the horizontal?
Was Bell in more of a dangerous position "angle" wise than Koopu?

then why have you spent your entire life living here?
move

I shall be.

 

[Jatz Crackers]

ahahhahahaha, i laughed so hard a little wee came out, gold.

Thats what happens when you take Berroccas prior to the judiciary handing down a humorous decision.

 

[El Diablo]

Inus tackle was fine was it?

you've already asked me that question. the answer is still the same.

Based up how they talk about going past the horizontal?
Was Bell more vertical than Koopu?

i don't believe the tackle looked to go past the horizontal. that's why he landed on his back.

I shall be.

sure. maybe you can ask locky for a lift in his jet.

 

[Charlie124]

Spear chuckers! Imagine a mother seeing that tackle and the player not being suspended for it. Something with a small margin for error, realistically, the result could've and has been alot worse with player suffering terrible injuries from tackles that started the same way and ended a few degrees worse. I would not want my child playing football knowing that something like that should only deserve the same punishment as having your hand in the play the ball.

Absolute joke, then they wonder why we are losing more kids to afl, which have all but eliminated dangerous contact in their tackling. Disgraceful!

small margin for error?? it WAS an error, you couldnt possibly believe it was deliberate.

if the result was a lot worse and the tackle was a few degrees worse, then it would have been looked at differently.

you have to look at what actually DID happen, not what might have happend if it was worse.

 

[Azkatro]

Just because a ref does not put it on report doesnt mean the player cant be charged by the MRC.
The report system is there only so the team can get a free interchange, no more no less.

Yeah I realise that. But I was suggesting that Archer, who was on the field right in front of the incident and saw it happen, didn't deem it serious enough to report it. I don't think the referees are given enough leverage or credit anymore for making decisions on the field. Sometimes I wonder why they're even there.

 

[Tonearm Terrorwrist]

small margin for error?? it WAS an error, you couldnt possibly believe it was deliberate.

if the result was a lot worse and the tackle was a few degrees worse, then it would have been looked at differently.

you have to look at what actually DID happen, not what might have happend if it was worse.

you'd take a different view if it were say adrian morley or jason ryles who made the tackle

 

[Charlie124]

morely and ryles arent halfbacks tackling backrowers. and theyre both repeat offenders (thurstons other offence was completly unrelated)

and not only that, even if it was ryles or morely you still cant say "oh, well it COULD have ended worse than it DID so he should be charged more"

ANYTHING COULD end up worse than it does.

 

[Tonearm Terrorwrist]

morely and ryles arent halfbacks tackling backrowers. and theyre both repeat offenders (thurstons other offence was completly unrelated)

exactly. guilty until proven innocent for some people which is why moz was always up on bullsh*t charges when he shouldn't of been and ryles is facing the same thing

 

[beave]

i always felt sorry for Moz, the man was always guilty before proven innocent. Hard, hard man, I always thought he might end up here in NQ because of his previous relationship with Muzza at Leeds. Awesome player, shame to see him run out of town by the judiciary the way he was.