I’ve said my piece on this subject. The first question on every recruiters lips is
“Can they defend”.
I know this, because I’ve spoken to many over the last few years, from a huge range of clubs.
That’s all I was saying. I even pointed out that it’s definitely not all they look at, but it’s definitely the most important thing, because it demonstrates a players ability to read the game in both defence and attack.
You called bullshit on that and then went on huge long winded rant which was pointless. Like you had an idea.
You get so caught up on your own crap that you forget what was even being discussed.
You say recruiters don't recruit unless then can defend, So those that make it to this level can clearly defend.
Or they don't get selected. The rest is coaches preferences as to style etc