bileduct
Coach
- Messages
- 17,832
Yeah, you hear them going on about that 1991 premiership all the time...the Raiders fans are proud of their 1991 premiership
why is that?
Yeah, you hear them going on about that 1991 premiership all the time...the Raiders fans are proud of their 1991 premiership
why is that?
How many years do we have to cop it for things done in 2014 and 2015? Maybe they should just wipe us out all together. FFS.
Its how the nfl punishes cap cheats. Why wouldnt it be legal.
And of course you can. You just cant re sign all the good players coming off contact and you have to replace them with minimum wage players. Say norman is on 500k then you are almost there
Well for a start you can very reasonably run an NFL team while 20, 30, or even 50% under the salary cap. So it's not really compatible at all to NRL.
A team having to run $1 million under the cap might as well not even bother playing games, as all they'll be doing is risking injury to players while getting lapped each week. If you forced a club to operate that far under tha cap for more than a couple years, I'd say half the clubs would go to the wall because of it with the hit to memberships, ticket sales, and everything else that would happen by collecting 3 consecutive spoons. Souths only survived such a run by selling out to Crowe, and most clubs don't have a multimillionaire willing to do that.
The eels should be operating on a reduced salary cap for a year. That should be the default punishment for teams caught cheating the cap. It should be
All points gained while cheating the cap are lost
Salary cap reduced by 1 million dollars the year after being caught
This would ensure clubs cant just cheat the cap to build a side and get rid of unwanted players to get under. Hopefully it wont destroy the club forever but it means that they might not be able to keep thr team they built by cheating.
I said one year not a couple of years and its a couple of good players replaced by minimum wage guys. A reduced cap as a punishment for cap cheating is just common sense. They should lose the players they illegally gained.
Dont be so melodramatic. Newcastle are probably a million dollars below what the broncos spend on salary.
When Melbourne got done for systematically cheating the cap I wanted them kicked out of the comp. my personal hatred of their team was a part of this heavy reaction. Now I'm glad they're in the comp. I'm glad they have to list an asterisk next to the tainted premierships. I hate them but I think it's good for the game that I get to hate them and that they still exist.
Parra I have a soft spot for. But they have hardly been punished to the full extent that I think would be fair. (I understand how subjective 'fair' is). I feel for their supporters. It must be shit for you guys. I know that my feelings about Melbourne were influenced by my hatred for them because I felt no such goodwill to their supporters.
But come on guys. Your club has been wracked by infighting forever. And now they have systematically rorted the cap. And been caught. How do you think this should play out? I don't want to see you kicked out. But the punishment should be a deterrent to all other clubs. And other clubs get caught, mete out a similar punishment to them too.
If you want to blame someone, blame the self interested board and staff that seem to permeate your club. The nrl has gone pretty soft on you. Softer than I would have.
We understand what you are saying, however it seems that having a whistleblower is the perquisite for getting caught and punished. There is no way that every other club has not organised TPAs and guaranteed payment to managers , we are extraordinarily pissed off at the vindictive pricks that are happy to sh*t on the club to prove hat point they think they have
When the other clubs rorted th cap, they did not have to shed players and in fact strengthened their rosters , but that was then
Personally , I don't trust Greenberg in this role, too convenient for my liking, given his dealings internally at the Dogs
We will come through this, but your sense of punishment far exceeds the crime,particularly as the club was under the cap in 2016 and was basically punished for having an idiot in control previously and then to compound it , not coming forward when they became aware of th scale of the problem.
Why is that, for next year so far We have lost Watmough (750,000) Peats (450,000) Junior Paulo (200,000), if sign Hayne we wouldn't resign Gordon (250,000) salary cap increases by 200,000 next year as well
We understand what you are saying, however it seems that having a whistleblower is the perquisite for getting caught and punished. There is no way that every other club has not organised TPAs and guaranteed payment to managers , we are extraordinarily pissed off at the vindictive pricks that are happy to sh*t on the club to prove hat point they think they have
When the other clubs rorted th cap, they did not have to shed:sarcasm
layers and in fact strengthened their rosters , but that was then
Personally , I don't trust Greenberg in this role, too convenient for my liking, given his dealings internally at the Dogs
We will come through this, but your sense of punishment far exceeds the crime,particularly as the club was under the cap in 2016 and was basically punished for having an idiot in control previously and then to compound it , not coming forward when they became aware of th scale of the problem.
Just incase it has been missed but Hayne wasn't selected for the Fiji London 7s squad. What that means to his plans I'm not sure.
I did track back a bit through the thread but it was all about Eels rather than Hayne.