His average is better than Smiths by like ~1. Smiths average is also a little deflated from his first stint in the side (under Clarkes captaincy he averages a touch over 40 for example) so Smiths average is on the increase as well.
his rise to fame was in the sub continent where most people fall from grace, cemented his spot in the Aussie team over there
doesn't have a good technique Smiffy but the kid has some starch
I am not championing I am just telling you to calm down. How many 100s has Williamson scored in Australia, South Africa or England ? He has had 12 innings. (the answer is 0)
He might well be a very good player or he might be a player who can't play a swinging ball or one with a bit of bounce.
Best Test innings I can see over there from Smith is 92, followed by 3 pretty average innings.
Smith has scored a century in England though.
So not even close. And I don't think its even close between Steven Smith and Williamson about who is the better now, and long term.
you said he'd only played against England or words to that effect
he's played against Pakistan and India away and England away and at home
considering his shit start he's done pretty well to get his current average up to 36+
true but hopefully Wilimason can still do a decent job and fill that middle order hole for you blokes
If by grade cricket you mean the backup tour batsmen to South Africa yes.
Steve Smith hasn't played against average boosting Bangladesh or Zimbabwe yet like Williamson has.