God-King Dean
Immortal
- Messages
- 46,614
The reaction to his return will be interesting...
The reaction to his return will be interesting...
The reaction to his return will be interesting...
So when Bird replied 'But it wasn't me' he was blaming his mate for pissing on the toilet seat.
No but these are serious allegations. Just the same way when a teacher is accused of abusing children they are immediately stood down.
p.s. when did matai abuse a woman?
you think Bird should've been stood down because he was charged. Matai was also charged so should he have been stood down?so you think matai should've been stood down and comparing this or watmoughs situation to this?
from jail?
So far youve the only sense that can be made of your posts are that you have trouble staying on track.
1) Youve challenged brookie by alleging he didnt care in relation to watmough with his previous incident while he advocates a negative position on this Bird incident. Obviously suggesting he is being hypocritical
2) Ive chimed in to question you on that position and asked you to back that up with some facts
3) Youve avoided answering that by posting a thread link (presumably in support of your assertion)
read a few posts up to where they say he wasn't charged. what do you think that means?
are you thick?
i have made it quite clear the contradictory comments in this thread are enough
watmoughs case was more of his ex fearing she'd lose the footballers wives lifestyle cause he didn't want her anymore
During the hearing, Watmough called three witnesses including Mr Mimis, Mr Byrnes, and friend Jesse Bird, who testified against Rixon's recollection of events.
But Magistrate Culver questioned the reliability of their evidence, also taking into account photographs showing bruises on Ms Rixon's arms.
so the bruising came from....?
c'mon now el d.
stop it, you're looking silly.
i'm agreeing with the cronulla club for standing him down.
he lied to the club & police, still very very different things to what watmough done & matai.
if it was as severe as birds case then yes, i'd want them totally gone from my club.
watmoughs case was more of his ex fearing she'd lose the footballers wives lifestyle cause he didn't want her anymore
as for matai, if the NRL stood down a player everytime they got charged for something silly on the piss, we'd have a lot of players gone!
I daresay she won't be struggling for money any time soon...
c'mon now el d.
stop it, you're looking silly.
i'm agreeing with the cronulla club for standing him down.
he lied to the club & police, still very very different things to what watmough done & matai.
if it was as severe as birds case then yes, i'd want them totally gone from my club.
watmoughs case was more of his ex fearing she'd lose the footballers wives lifestyle cause he didn't want her anymore
as for matai, if the NRL stood down a player everytime they got charged for something silly on the piss, we'd have a lot of players gone!
FMD
I've told you TWICE
this bloody thread has the contradictory comments
first time
second time
why do i need to give you a link to a thread you're already posting in and why am i having to tell you this THREE times:crazy:
Pretty obvious from your frustrated,
Watmough wasn't charged, and the allegations against him are far less serious than Birds.