Molly
Juniors
- Messages
- 474
Pretty bored with this whole issue, however there are two points that I heard discussed a couple of weeks ago which I thought were interesting...
1 - The NRL have made a decision re the agreement being a firm contract and are not allowing the written agreement with the storm to be recognised.
The decison the NRL have made is perhaps not theirs to make as it is a point of law that the courts will need to decisde, so their decision on which side they are on is largely irrelevant.
2 - Given the above point, Turner may have a case against NRL in the area of restraint of trade, as they are forcing his options in refusing to recognise his written agreement.
End of the day, who cares really....teh Storm have the depth to cover Turner and he isnt going to make much difference to the Titans overall, given their inside players the ball aint going any where near him, whether he plays fullback or wing. I guess he just doesnt want to get flogged each week.
1 - The NRL have made a decision re the agreement being a firm contract and are not allowing the written agreement with the storm to be recognised.
The decison the NRL have made is perhaps not theirs to make as it is a point of law that the courts will need to decisde, so their decision on which side they are on is largely irrelevant.
2 - Given the above point, Turner may have a case against NRL in the area of restraint of trade, as they are forcing his options in refusing to recognise his written agreement.
End of the day, who cares really....teh Storm have the depth to cover Turner and he isnt going to make much difference to the Titans overall, given their inside players the ball aint going any where near him, whether he plays fullback or wing. I guess he just doesnt want to get flogged each week.