God-King Dean
Immortal
- Messages
- 46,614
Definitely. But it's pretty clear Ryles has a huge strike through his name.
Last edited:
i hope for nsw's sake that terry campese gets some game time this series. He should be nsw 5/8th next season if his form holds true...
He might get some time from the bench. He has better utility value then gids. Imo if kurt wasn't pick as a fullback he shouldn't have been picked at all. I dont rate him in any other position. Awesome fullback but not a utilities arsehole. Campo can play lock, halves, centre and even2nd row at a pinch
What are you on?i hope for nsw's sake that terry campese gets some game time this series. He should be nsw 5/8th next season if his form holds true...
He might get some time from the bench. He has better utility value then gids. Imo if kurt wasn't pick as a fullback he shouldn't have been picked at all. I dont rate him in any other position. Awesome fullback but not a utilities arsehole. Campo can play lock, halves, centre and even2nd row at a pinch
Except that Cross has averaged more metres and more tackles per game than Perry this season, with limited fitness. Sort've a prop's main role in a team...
perry has averaged more minuted per game
and isnt injury prone
the difference in tackles is negligible with cross having .03 more per game.
perry has averaged almost 100 metres, 99.11, corss has average just under 90 with 89.36.
cross has avergaed more missed tackles
has a negligible advanatge in hitups (again .03)
but averages 1.3 less average runs
and cross also has an advataneg in offloads averaging 1 more a game.
so a lot of what you said was just wrong
and these stats point to perry having a better season
and even if they were even who was going to make the squad, the premiership prop or the prop whos team missed the 8?
So he makes less metres and less tackles even though he's on the field longer? Understandably Cross's match fitness was down, I thought that went without saying. There's a reason he was playing his best footy at the end of the season when he strung four games together.
The better prop, you'd hope.
I got the stats from nrl.com., if they are wrong then its not my fault I can only comment on what I saw. Based on those stats the things you were saying were wrong, so if thats not the case then I apologise.
and as for the last comment I said even if they were even who would you pick, which implies neither are better.
so where should I look for the accurate stats?
bullsh*t, queensland got jibbed again!
**edit - i should explain
12 qld's and 12 nsw's, if nsw dominated origin for the last three years like qld did it would be 75% nsw players, but because it's queensland we only get 50%, where is sam thaiday? he's a better player then glenn stewert, also k hunt is a better utility then gidley, i'm assuming they only missed out becasue of pending investigations???
From a Queensland point of view, the rip off at Australian rep level continues. Despite winning three years in a row, Queensland again is in the minority of representatives, continuing a tradition that has lasted since who knows when ...
This is bias selections in the highest order! How many series wins do Queensland need to win to gain a higher representation? Six, seven, eight??? Double figures is my guess!
And who missed out? Thaiday for a start. Hannant and Myles have played more consistent football than Perry.
Hey if B. Webb gets ruled out of the Kiwi's perhaps we should call up Mr Hunt?!?!?!? On second thoughts nah no one would room with him
That didnt take very long :roll:
What are you on?
Kurt can play any position from 1 to 7 and also 9 at a firstgrade standard.
When he played halfback he was being considered for NSW in that position.
if push came to shove he could probably do a fair job at lock as well.