BDGS
Bench
- Messages
- 4,102
The IC should ask the nine network where they would like to see any new teams. That would give some indication where teams should go.
That is the funniest thing i have ever read about NRL expansion. The Next TV deal will assure that whatever FTA channel that gets the next TV rights deal will have less input into the NRL (draws, times, teams) then ever before. Channel 9 at the moment are favorites to lose the rights. Why would they ask channel 9? lmao.
Be careful what you wish for. If you keep talking up the CQ bid like that the IC might just go for them. Whatever happens it has to be WA and QLD.
People have to stop thinking about it in terms of QLD and NSW. The NRL have stated many times they are not going to do what they have done in the past and what other codes are doing and failing at now and put 'dots on a map'. Therefore straight away any argument about expansion that brings up any state in its argument is one not worth arguing. What is wroth arguing though is the three current NRL bids and the one bid trying to get off the ground. Location is not important to expansion, the only thing that counts is the community. If there is enough of a community push and the bid has a strong business plan that engages the community, fans, locals and kids as well as being able to attract more sponsors to the game and a overall adding to the game.
IMO, there is only two current bids that can do all that and those two bids will enter the competition in 2013.
And would prolong the interest.
And make liars out of themselves.
Maybe so. But the fact remains there is no need for an 11th NSW team.
That is opinionated, nothing opinionated by the very different of the word can be fact.
If that were the case i could start saying outrageous things like "fact is, Qatar remains a important area to put a team for the NRL survival long term."